aiqbench analysis
This research addresses a critical gap in autonomous surface vehicle navigation by benchmarking electromagnetic log (EMLog) calibration models for scenarios where traditional Doppler velocity logs are unavailable. The study validates that a Kalman filter-based bias and scale error model significantly improves speed estimation accuracy by 71% under dynamic sea conditions, offering a robust solution for real-time online calibration.
Benchmarking EMlog Calibration for Autonomous Surface Vehicles
arXiv:2609.39203v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate velocity measurement is a fundamental requirement for autonomous surface and underwater vehicles. Commonly, velocity is provided by a Doppler velocity log (DVL) sensor, yet it becomes unavailable due to operational altitude constraints. In such situations, electromagnetic logs (EMLogs) provide a critically robust alternative for continuous velocity estimation. However, raw EMLog measurements are inherently corrupted by systematic errors, which need to be calibrated prior mission begins. Currently, a benchmarking comparative evaluation of how different calibration models perform under rapidly changing dynamic sea conditions is missing in the literature. To bridge this gap, this paper presents a comparative model-based calibration methodology that evaluates four distinct calibration models using two different estimation pipelines. The proposed framework is rigorously validated on a unique 221 minutes of continuous real-world telemetry collected from the MARVEL surface vehicle during dynamic sea trials. The dataset contains two different EMLogs and DVL recordings. Experimental results demonstrate that the bias and scale error model implemented with the Kalman filter improves the speed estimation by 71%. We also demonstrate that dynamical manoeuvres further improve the accuracy compared to standard straight-line paths, ultimately delivering a validated, real-time online calibration EMLog approach for autonomous surface vehicles.
Abstract:Accurate velocity measurement is a fundamental requirement for autonomous surface and underwater vehicles. Commonly, velocity is provided by a Doppler velocity log (DVL) sensor, yet it becomes unavailable due to operational altitude constraints. In such situations, electromagnetic logs (EMLogs) provide a critically robust alternative for continuous velocity estimation. However, raw EMLog measurements are inherently corrupted by systematic errors, which need to be calibrated prior mission begins. Currently, a benchmarking comparative evaluation of how different calibration models perform under rapidly changing dynamic sea conditions is missing in the literature. To bridge this gap, this paper presents a comparative model-based calibration methodology that evaluates four distinct calibration models using two different estimation pipelines. The proposed framework is rigorously validated on a unique 221 minutes of continuous real-world telemetry collected from the MARVEL surface vehicle during dynamic sea trials. The dataset contains two different EMLogs and DVL recordings. Experimental results demonstrate that the bias and scale error model implemented with the Kalman filter improves the speed estimation by 71%. We also demonstrate that dynamical manoeuvres further improve the accuracy compared to standard straight-line paths, ultimately delivering a validated, real-time online calibration EMLog approach for autonomous surface vehicles.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2609.39203 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2609.39203v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.39203 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 287 words
