aiqbench analysis
This study validates the utility of EEG foundation models through 20,000 evaluations, demonstrating that pretraining offers consistent performance gains over supervised baselines and that scaling pretraining data yields sustained improvements. The findings also clarify that parameter count alone does not guarantee better results, while flexible channel configurations outperform constrained ones across most tasks. By releasing an open-source benchmark framework, the authors provide essential infrastructure for reproducible research in neural signal processing and model comparison.
Benchmarking EEG Foundation Models at Scale: Lessons from 20,000 Evaluations
arXiv:2609.32743v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) foundation models (FMs) promise transferable neural representations, yet their advantages over strong supervised baselines and their prospects for further scaling remain unclear. To address these questions, we introduce EEG-Arena, an open-source benchmark covering 30 EEG FMs and 25 supervised baselines evaluated on 57 downstream tasks from 23 public datasets. Through more than 20,000 evaluations across five experimental protocols, we assess downstream performance, pretraining benefits, model size scaling, pretraining data scaling, and robustness to channel configuration. We find that (1) EEG FMs outperform strong task-specific supervised baselines on most evaluated tasks, particularly under non-bipolar settings; (2) compared with architecture-matched supervised training from scratch, pretraining improves both early optimization and final downstream performance, with larger and more consistent gains as more labeled downstream data become available; (3) existing EEG FMs do not exhibit a consistent positive relationship between parameter count and downstream performance; (4) under a fixed architecture, increasing the pretraining data scale yields sustained downstream gains; and (5) channel-flexible FMs achieve higher absolute performance than channel-constrained models across most evaluated channel configurations. Together, these findings demonstrate the downstream value of EEG FMs and identify pretraining data expansion as a promising direction for further progress. To support continued research, we release EEG-Arena as an open-source evaluation framework that provides shared infrastructure for reproducible benchmarking, model comparison, and community-driven development.
Abstract:Electroencephalography (EEG) foundation models (FMs) promise transferable neural representations, yet their advantages over strong supervised baselines and their prospects for further scaling remain unclear. To address these questions, we introduce EEG-Arena, an open-source benchmark covering 30 EEG FMs and 25 supervised baselines evaluated on 57 downstream tasks from 23 public datasets. Through more than 20,000 evaluations across five experimental protocols, we assess downstream performance, pretraining benefits, model size scaling, pretraining data scaling, and robustness to channel configuration. We find that (1) EEG FMs outperform strong task-specific supervised baselines on most evaluated tasks, particularly under non-bipolar settings; (2) compared with architecture-matched supervised training from scratch, pretraining improves both early optimization and final downstream performance, with larger and more consistent gains as more labeled downstream data become available; (3) existing EEG FMs do not exhibit a consistent positive relationship between parameter count and downstream performance; (4) under a fixed architecture, increasing the pretraining data scale yields sustained downstream gains; and (5) channel-flexible FMs achieve higher absolute performance than channel-constrained models across most evaluated channel configurations. Together, these findings demonstrate the downstream value of EEG FMs and identify pretraining data expansion as a promising direction for further progress. To support continued research, we release EEG-Arena as an open-source evaluation framework that provides shared infrastructure for reproducible benchmarking, model comparison, and community-driven development.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Signal Processing (eess.SP)
arXiv:2609.32743 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.32743v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32743 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 316 words
Related coverage

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026

Jev: System One models for Prod, not God — with Diogo Almeida, CEO, TypeSafe AI
Latent Space · Sep 21, 2026

Presentation: Building Evals for AI Adoption: from Principles to Practice
InfoQ · May 29, 2026

How Decathlon runs demand forecasting at scale with Chronos-2
AWS · Aug 28, 2026