Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes a critical benchmark for evaluating PDF parsers specifically on their ability to extract mathematical formulas, addressing a significant gap in current training data for large language models. By utilizing synthetic documents and LLM-as-a-judge evaluation, the study provides actionable insights into performance disparities among existing tools, directly impacting the reliability of scientific knowledge bases.
Sources coveringarXiv, AI Alignment Forum, Latent Space
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Benchmarking Document Parsers on Mathematical Formula Extraction from PDFs

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2512.09874v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Correctly parsing mathematical formulas from PDFs is critical for training large language models and building scientific knowledge bases from academic literature, yet existing benchmarks either exclude formulas entirely or lack semantically-aware evaluation metrics. We introduce a benchmarking framework centered on synthetically generated PDFs with precise LaTeX ground truth, enabling systematic control over layout, formulas, and content characteristics. For evaluation, we apply LLM-as-a-judge to assess semantic equivalence of parsed formulas, capturing mathematical meaning beyond surface-level notation differences. We validate this approach through a human study (250 formula pairs, 750 ratings from 30 evaluators), showing a Pearson correlation of r=0.78 with human judgment, compared to r=0.34 for character-level matching (CDM) and r~0 for text similarity. Our robust two-stage matching pipeline combining LLM-based extraction with fuzzy validation reliably aligns parsed formulas with ground truth despite format inconsistencies across parsers. Evaluating 20+ contemporary PDF parsers across 100 synthetic documents with 2,000+ formulas reveals significant performance disparities, providing actionable guidance for practitioners selecting parsers for downstream applications. Code and benchmark data: https://github.com/phorn1/pdf-parse-bench and https://github.com/phorn1/formula-metric-study

Abstract:Correctly parsing mathematical formulas from PDFs is critical for training large language models and building scientific knowledge bases from academic literature, yet existing benchmarks either exclude formulas entirely or lack semantically-aware evaluation metrics. We introduce a benchmarking framework centered on synthetically generated PDFs with precise LaTeX ground truth, enabling systematic control over layout, formulas, and content characteristics. For evaluation, we apply LLM-as-a-judge to assess semantic equivalence of parsed formulas, capturing mathematical meaning beyond surface-level notation differences. We validate this approach through a human study (250 formula pairs, 750 ratings from 30 evaluators), showing a Pearson correlation of r=0.78 with human judgment, compared to r=0.34 for character-level matching (CDM) and r~0 for text similarity. Our robust two-stage matching pipeline combining LLM-based extraction with fuzzy validation reliably aligns parsed formulas with ground truth despite format inconsistencies across parsers. Evaluating 20+ contemporary PDF parsers across 100 synthetic documents with 2,000+ formulas reveals significant performance disparities, providing actionable guidance for practitioners selecting parsers for downstream applications. Code and benchmark data: this https URL and this https URL

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)

arXiv:2512.09874 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2512.09874v3 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.09874 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Pattern Recognition. ICPR 2026. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 16813, pp. 93-107. Springer, Cham, 2026

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-31583-0_7 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 300 words

Related coverage