Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This study empirically benchmarks deep learning architectures like GRU, Transformer, and TimesNet against real-world IBM Cloud telemetry, revealing that short-term deviations dominate cloud anomalies rather than periodic patterns. The findings highlight the critical need for timing-aware evaluation metrics and robust post-processing to balance early detection sensitivity with false-positive rates in production environments.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Benchmarking Deep Learning Models for Anomaly Detection in Real-World Cloud Telemetry

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.15818v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern cloud platforms generate high-dimensional, noisy telemetry from thousands of microservices. Unlike classical anomaly detection benchmarks, cloud anomalies are short-lived, irregular, and largely non-periodic, making timely detection challenging. We present an empirical benchmark of deep learning models for anomaly detection using a real-world IBM Cloud Console dataset. We evaluate GRU, Transformer, TimesNet, and Autoformer architectures using the Numenta Anomaly Benchmark (NAB), a timing-aware metric that accounts for early detection and false alarms. TimesNet achieves the highest NAB scores due to strong early-detection sensitivity. Transformer models also detect anomalies early but incur higher false-positive rates. An improved GRU autoencoder, incorporating robust scoring and persistence rules, achieves competitive performance with a more stable false-alarm profile. Overall, the modest performance differences suggest that real cloud anomalies are dominated by short-term deviations rather than persistent periodic structure, emphasizing the importance of timing-aware evaluation and robust post-processing.

Abstract:Modern cloud platforms generate high-dimensional, noisy telemetry from thousands of microservices. Unlike classical anomaly detection benchmarks, cloud anomalies are short-lived, irregular, and largely non-periodic, making timely detection challenging. We present an empirical benchmark of deep learning models for anomaly detection using a real-world IBM Cloud Console dataset. We evaluate GRU, Transformer, TimesNet, and Autoformer architectures using the Numenta Anomaly Benchmark (NAB), a timing-aware metric that accounts for early detection and false alarms. TimesNet achieves the highest NAB scores due to strong early-detection sensitivity. Transformer models also detect anomalies early but incur higher false-positive rates. An improved GRU autoencoder, incorporating robust scoring and persistence rules, achieves competitive performance with a more stable false-alarm profile. Overall, the modest performance differences suggest that real cloud anomalies are dominated by short-term deviations rather than persistent periodic structure, emphasizing the importance of timing-aware evaluation and robust post-processing.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC)

arXiv:2610.15818 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.15818v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.15818 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

2026 11th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analytics (ICCCBDA), Chengdu, China, 2026, pp. 709-714

https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCBDA69573.2026.11676496 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 269 words

Related coverage