aiqbench analysis
This study benchmarks ConvLSTM architectures against simpler statistical and neural baselines for one-day-ahead rainfall prediction using Indian monsoon data, revealing that complex convolutional recurrence does not consistently outperform FC-LSTM or persistence models. The findings suggest that architecture selection should be driven by specific performance metrics like spatial anomaly detection rather than a default preference for deep learning in gridded input scenarios where simpler methods often suffice.
Benchmarking ConvLSTM for One-Day-Ahead IMDAA Rainfall-Field Prediction across Four Indian Cities
arXiv:2607.26581v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Convolutional long short-term memory networks (ConvLSTMs) are widely used for precipitation forecasting, but most evidence for their performance comes from dense, high-frequency radar sequences. This study tests whether convolutional recurrence improves one-day-ahead rainfall-field prediction on small daily reanalysis grids. Indian Monsoon Data Assimilation and Analysis (IMDAA) fields for June-September 1998-2020 were analysed for Bengaluru, Delhi, Kolkata and Mumbai. Ten naive, statistical, tree-based and neural approaches were compared using atmospheric-only and rainfall-history-plus-atmospheric inputs. Performance was assessed for complete fields, domain-mean rainfall, spatial anomalies and high-rainfall days. ConvLSTM did not consistently outperform simpler alternatives. FC-LSTM produced the numerically lowest domain-mean rainfall error in Bengaluru, Kolkata and Mumbai, whereas persistence performed best in Delhi. ConvLSTM produced the numerically lowest spatial-anomaly error only in Mumbai, where rainfall fields showed greater short-term spatial continuity and rainfall-history inputs improved all three neural architectures. The difference between ConvLSTM and FC-LSTM was nevertheless small. Neural models underestimated rainfall magnitude and predicted too few threshold exceedances on high-rainfall days, while persistence achieved the highest detection performance in every city. Post-hoc analyses showed that the selected models were most sensitive to the latest input day, with broader recent-lag sensitivity in Mumbai. These findings show that gridded inputs alone do not justify ConvLSTM and that architecture choice should follow strong benchmarking across average, spatial and high-rainfall performance.
Abstract:Convolutional long short-term memory networks (ConvLSTMs) are widely used for precipitation forecasting, but most evidence for their performance comes from dense, high-frequency radar sequences. This study tests whether convolutional recurrence improves one-day-ahead rainfall-field prediction on small daily reanalysis grids. Indian Monsoon Data Assimilation and Analysis (IMDAA) fields for June-September 1998-2020 were analysed for Bengaluru, Delhi, Kolkata and Mumbai. Ten naive, statistical, tree-based and neural approaches were compared using atmospheric-only and rainfall-history-plus-atmospheric inputs. Performance was assessed for complete fields, domain-mean rainfall, spatial anomalies and high-rainfall days. ConvLSTM did not consistently outperform simpler alternatives. FC-LSTM produced the numerically lowest domain-mean rainfall error in Bengaluru, Kolkata and Mumbai, whereas persistence performed best in Delhi. ConvLSTM produced the numerically lowest spatial-anomaly error only in Mumbai, where rainfall fields showed greater short-term spatial continuity and rainfall-history inputs improved all three neural architectures. The difference between ConvLSTM and FC-LSTM was nevertheless small. Neural models underestimated rainfall magnitude and predicted too few threshold exceedances on high-rainfall days, while persistence achieved the highest detection performance in every city. Post-hoc analyses showed that the selected models were most sensitive to the latest input day, with broader recent-lag sensitivity in Mumbai. These findings show that gridded inputs alone do not justify ConvLSTM and that architecture choice should follow strong benchmarking across average, spatial and high-rainfall performance.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2607.26581 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2607.26581v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.26581 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 310 words
