Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This benchmark establishes critical performance baselines for automatic speech recognition across five Iberian languages, revealing significant trade-offs between accuracy, efficiency, and coverage for low-resource dialects like Basque. The study also highlights persistent fairness issues, specifically consistent sex disparities across most evaluated systems, which are essential considerations for deploying multilingual AI in real-world scenarios.
Sources coveringarXiv, Quantum Computing Report
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Benchmarking Automatic Speech Recognition Tools for Iberian Languages

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.36920v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Comprehensive evaluations of automatic speech recognition (ASR) for Iberian languages remain limited, and low-resource languages, biases, and efficiency trade-offs are underexplored. We benchmark eleven systems, ten open-weight models and one commercial API, across five Iberian languages (Basque, Catalan, Galician, Portuguese, Spanish), with German and Turkish as controls. Evaluation uses an 85-hour dataset covering read speech, broadcast media, and audiobooks, assessing accuracy and efficiency via word error rate (WER) and real-time factors (RTF/RTFx). Results show no single model dominates: accuracy, efficiency, and language coverage present clear trade-offs. Low-resource languages, especially Basque, degrade significantly, highlighting the role of training coverage. We observe consistent sex disparities across most systems, highlighting fairness challenges in multilingual ASR. Overall, the benchmark provides practical guidance for real-world model selection.

Abstract:Comprehensive evaluations of automatic speech recognition (ASR) for Iberian languages remain limited, and low-resource languages, biases, and efficiency trade-offs are underexplored. We benchmark eleven systems, ten open-weight models and one commercial API, across five Iberian languages (Basque, Catalan, Galician, Portuguese, Spanish), with German and Turkish as controls. Evaluation uses an 85-hour dataset covering read speech, broadcast media, and audiobooks, assessing accuracy and efficiency via word error rate (WER) and real-time factors (RTF/RTFx). Results show no single model dominates: accuracy, efficiency, and language coverage present clear trade-offs. Low-resource languages, especially Basque, degrade significantly, highlighting the role of training coverage. We observe consistent sex disparities across most systems, highlighting fairness challenges in multilingual ASR. Overall, the benchmark provides practical guidance for real-world model selection.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2609.36920 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.36920v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36920 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 217 words

Related coverage