aiqbench analysis
This benchmark finds that the analytical error bounds for a randomized quantum algorithm are loose, while the imaginary-time bound is fairly tight. The bigger takeaway is the sample count: roughly 10^10 for the smallest cytochrome P450 active spaces and beyond 10^15 for the largest, which suggests measurement strategy or algorithmic scaling must improve before early fault-tolerant chemistry becomes competitive. For quantum readers, it's a useful reality check on the gap between theoretical advantage claims and resource requirements for industrial molecular problems.
Benchmarking a randomized quantum algorithm for estimating expectation values of molecular observables
arXiv:2610.16379v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Randomized quantum algorithms for the estimation of expectation values of molecular observables offer a promising route to early fault-tolerant quantum advantage by trading circuit depth for an increased number of samples. However, this begs the question whether the resulting measurement overhead remains feasible for industrially relevant molecular systems. In this work, we benchmark the randomized sampling algorithm of Wang et al. [1] through numerical simulations on a hydrogen molecule and resource estimates for various active spaces of the cytochrome P450, an industry-relevant system in the pharmaceutical industry. Our numerical simulations reveal that the analytical error bounds significantly overestimate the actual sampling error, whereas the analytical bound on the required imaginary evolution time is comparatively tight, exceeding a direct DMRG estimate by roughly 44% for the active space where the comparison is feasible. The measurement overhead nevertheless remains prohibitively high: even for the smallest active spaces, the expectation-value estimation alone requires around 1010 samples, scaling to beyond 1015 for the largest active spaces considered. These results suggest that substantial improvements in measurement strategies or algorithmic scaling are necessary before randomized early-fault-tolerant algorithms become competitive for industrial quantum chemistry applications.
Abstract:Randomized quantum algorithms for the estimation of expectation values of molecular observables offer a promising route to early fault-tolerant quantum advantage by trading circuit depth for an increased number of samples. However, this begs the question whether the resulting measurement overhead remains feasible for industrially relevant molecular systems. In this work, we benchmark the randomized sampling algorithm of Wang et al. [1] through numerical simulations on a hydrogen molecule and resource estimates for various active spaces of the cytochrome P450, an industry-relevant system in the pharmaceutical industry. Our numerical simulations reveal that the analytical error bounds significantly overestimate the actual sampling error, whereas the analytical bound on the required imaginary evolution time is comparatively tight, exceeding a direct DMRG estimate by roughly 44% for the active space where the comparison is feasible. The measurement overhead nevertheless remains prohibitively high: even for the smallest active spaces, the expectation-value estimation alone requires around 1010 samples, scaling to beyond 1015 for the largest active spaces considered. These results suggest that substantial improvements in measurement strategies or algorithmic scaling are necessary before randomized early-fault-tolerant algorithms become competitive for industrial quantum chemistry applications.
arXiv:2610.16379 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.16379v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.16379 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 279 words
Related coverage

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026
Running Variational Quantum Eigensolver with Qiskit Aer on AMD Instinct
AMD · May 29, 2026

AI and Quantum Computing Briefing
livetradingnews.com · Aug 4, 2026