aiqbench analysis
This study exposes critical reliability risks in small-model knowledge distillation for function routing, revealing that single-seed evaluations can mask severe bimodal collapse where models fail catastrophically on a subset of training runs. The research identifies specific failure modes, such as premature output truncation during reasoning tasks, and demonstrates that only certain distillation strategies maintain consistent performance across multiple random seeds. For deployment scenarios requiring robustness, these findings argue against relying on standard single-run benchmarks which may overlook central failure modes inherent to the training process.
Below the Noise Floor: Bimodal Seed Collapse and Distinct Failure Modes in Small-Model Knowledge Distillation
arXiv:2608.27729v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Function routing -- selecting the correct API call from a fixed catalog given a natural-language request -- is a deployment problem where small students are attractive but knowledge distillation gains are typically reported single-seed, at scales where seed variance is unknown. On a 740-instance healthcare API routing task with a 1.5B Qwen student and a 20B teacher, we compare eight KD variants against supervised cross-entropy, using three to six seeds for key configurations. We find: (i) per-seed standard deviation ranges from 2.8 to 48.7 percentage points, swallowing every claimed KD gain below five points; (ii) three of seven KD variants exhibit bimodal collapse, with at least one in three to five seeds falling below 55% accuracy while the others train normally, and a fourth showing elevated variance; (iii) collapse has distinct modes -- wrong-function selection for ce_kd and ce_paraphrase, and a previously undocumented output-truncation mode for reasoning_kd, where the model emits reasoning but terminates before producing a function name (0.9% accuracy); (iv) only progressive_kd and rank_kd avoid collapse across observed seeds, with sigma <= 3.9 pp; (v) a naive cross-split +3.78 pp gain from input enrichment reverses to -2.70 pp under controlled within-split multi-seed re-testing. Single-seed evaluation is therefore unable to detect central failure modes in small-model KD.
Abstract:Function routing -- selecting the correct API call from a fixed catalog given a natural-language request -- is a deployment problem where small students are attractive but knowledge distillation gains are typically reported single-seed, at scales where seed variance is unknown. On a 740-instance healthcare API routing task with a 1.5B Qwen student and a 20B teacher, we compare eight KD variants against supervised cross-entropy, using three to six seeds for key configurations. We find: (i) per-seed standard deviation ranges from 2.8 to 48.7 percentage points, swallowing every claimed KD gain below five points; (ii) three of seven KD variants exhibit bimodal collapse, with at least one in three to five seeds falling below 55% accuracy while the others train normally, and a fourth showing elevated variance; (iii) collapse has distinct modes -- wrong-function selection for ce_kd and ce_paraphrase, and a previously undocumented output-truncation mode for reasoning_kd, where the model emits reasoning but terminates before producing a function name (0.9% accuracy); (iv) only progressive_kd and rank_kd avoid collapse across observed seeds, with sigma <= 3.9 pp; (v) a naive cross-split +3.78 pp gain from input enrichment reverses to -2.70 pp under controlled within-split multi-seed re-testing. Single-seed evaluation is therefore unable to detect central failure modes in small-model KD.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2608.27729 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.27729v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.27729 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 303 words
Related coverage

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026

Reviewing failure modes in science as we prepare for AI researchers
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026
The Open ASR Leaderboard Adds Its First Global South Language
Hugging Face · Aug 28, 2026
Mean Accuracy Is the Wrong Estimand for a Release Decision
arXiv · Oct 14, 2026