aiqbench analysis
This research presents the BAIT controller, which addresses cumulative performance decay in repeated human-robot interactions by explicitly modeling evolving human beliefs about robot capabilities. By integrating hierarchical particle filters with predictive planning under strict task constraints, the system maintains high trust levels without resorting to erratic behaviors that erode user confidence. This work advances safe and scalable long-term interaction strategies for autonomous systems like GEM vehicles operating in dynamic environments.
Belief-Aware Influence and Trust (BAIT): Shaping Human Belief During Repeated Human-Robot Interaction
arXiv:2607.25327v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Repeated human-robot interaction (HRI) requires proactively accounting for humans who continually adapt to evolving beliefs about the robot. Prior frameworks often treat encounters as isolated events, suffering cumulative task performance decay as human perception drifts, or maintain long-term influence through erratic, unpredictable behavior that erodes perceived human trust and relies on computationally unscalable formulations. To address these gaps, we introduce the Belief- Aware Influence and Trust (BAIT) controller. BAIT integrates a hierarchical particle filter, which infers both fast human strategic shifts and slow perceptual belief updates, with a belief-aware Model Predictive Path Integral planner. BAIT explicitly optimizes the trade-off between long-horizon influence and human trust, while enforcing immediate task performance as a strict constraint. Across simulations, a human-subject study, and a real-world GEM vehicle deployments in repeated lane-merging scenarios, BAIT achieves task performance comparable to baselines that optimize long-term influence through unpredictability while yielding significantly higher user trust. The video demonstrating our experiments is available at https://youtu.be/GsPfHRujzVs.
Abstract:Repeated human-robot interaction (HRI) requires proactively accounting for humans who continually adapt to evolving beliefs about the robot. Prior frameworks often treat encounters as isolated events, suffering cumulative task performance decay as human perception drifts, or maintain long-term influence through erratic, unpredictable behavior that erodes perceived human trust and relies on computationally unscalable formulations. To address these gaps, we introduce the Belief- Aware Influence and Trust (BAIT) controller. BAIT integrates a hierarchical particle filter, which infers both fast human strategic shifts and slow perceptual belief updates, with a belief-aware Model Predictive Path Integral planner. BAIT explicitly optimizes the trade-off between long-horizon influence and human trust, while enforcing immediate task performance as a strict constraint. Across simulations, a human-subject study, and a real-world GEM vehicle deployments in repeated lane-merging scenarios, BAIT achieves task performance comparable to baselines that optimize long-term influence through unpredictability while yielding significantly higher user trust. The video demonstrating our experiments is available at this https URL.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2607.25327 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2607.25327v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.25327 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 252 words
Related coverage
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026
Current AIs out-persuade professionals in lab settings but (probably) not in the world
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026
Assessing Information Ecosystems : How Governments Can Get Ahead of Hybrid Threats
carnegieendowment.org · Aug 5, 2026