Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates the interpretability of Domain-Adapted models via Prompt-based Fine-tuning (DAPF) for dementia detection, revealing a critical gap between high diagnostic accuracy and token-level explanation faithfulness. The study demonstrates that while the [MASK] representation effectively captures diagnosis information, attribution analyses are largely driven by linguistic artifacts rather than genuine causal factors, challenging the reliability of current explainability methods in low-resource medical settings.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Behind the [MASK]: Disentangling Representation and Faithfulness in DAPF-Based Dementia Detection

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.25028v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Spoken-language analysis via prompt-based domain-adaptive models is a promising direction for low-resource, non-invasive dementia screening, but such models remain internally opaque. We study the interpretability of the Domain-Adapted models via Prompt-based Fine-tuning (DAPF) framework, which casts dementia detection as diagnosis-related masked-token prediction. We interpret DAPF and strong baselines using a variety of probing and analysis techniques, finding that DAPF achieved the best overall performance (accuracy=0.83 and macro-F1=0.83) with diagnosis most recoverable from its [MASK] representation. However, this representational advantage did not extend to token-level explanation faithfulness. DAPF attributions primarily reflected language task vocabulary, discourse markers, and transcription artifacts, with perturbation tests showing weak or negative effects. This suggests that its masked-token interface determines diagnosis information without producing faithful token-level explanations.

Abstract:Spoken-language analysis via prompt-based domain-adaptive models is a promising direction for low-resource, non-invasive dementia screening, but such models remain internally opaque. We study the interpretability of the Domain-Adapted models via Prompt-based Fine-tuning (DAPF) framework, which casts dementia detection as diagnosis-related masked-token prediction. We interpret DAPF and strong baselines using a variety of probing and analysis techniques, finding that DAPF achieved the best overall performance (accuracy=0.83 and macro-F1=0.83) with diagnosis most recoverable from its [MASK] representation. However, this representational advantage did not extend to token-level explanation faithfulness. DAPF attributions primarily reflected language task vocabulary, discourse markers, and transcription artifacts, with perturbation tests showing weak or negative effects. This suggests that its masked-token interface determines diagnosis information without producing faithful token-level explanations.

16 pages, 1 figure, 19 tables. Under review at ACL Rolling Review

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2608.25028 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2608.25028v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.25028 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 230 words

Related coverage