aiqbench analysis
The paper uses an offline LLM to generate behavioral parameters for agents in a limit order book simulator, then tests whether those LLM-derived priors reproduce Bitcoin perpetual-futures flash crashes better than uninformative priors (crash rate 0.176 vs. 0.008 in 500 runs). For AI readers, the useful question is whether LLM elicitation, anchored to empirical microstructure data, yields validated parameters or mainly reflects the model's priors, and the study is a single-venue, synthetic-environment result that needs independent replication. The counterfactual findings are also model-conditional, so they should be treated as hypotheses rather than causal conclusions about real markets.
Behavioral Prior Elicitation via LLM for Heterogeneous-Agent Bitcoin Flash-Crash Simulation
arXiv:2611.03660v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Bitcoin perpetual futures trade continuously with shallow liquidity and high price impact, making them prone to millisecond-scale flash crashes. Agent-based limit order book simulators are a natural tool for studying such events, but their behavioral parameters are usually hand-crafted or require full order book histories that are rarely available at scale. We propose a four-stage pipeline that constructs a reproducible 100 ms BTCUSDT flash-crash event panel from 66 detected events, elicits behavioral priors for four agent archetypes using an offline large language model conditioned on empirical microstructure anchors, instantiates a heterogeneous limit order book simulator with the validated priors, and applies causal discovery plus counterfactual analysis to the resulting synthetic panel. Across 500 simulation runs, LLM-elicited priors produce a crash rate of 0.176 versus 0.008 under uninformative uniform priors and generate heav- ier return tails. In the frozen counterfactual analysis, reducing leverage amplification by one within-sample standard deviation lowers the predicted crash rate from 0.176 to 0.136, whereas reducing directional pressure yields only a marginal change. These find- ings suggest that empirically anchored LLM elicitation can improve simulator fidelity and help identify plausible crash-amplification mechanisms in a controlled synthetic environment
Abstract:Bitcoin perpetual futures trade continuously with shallow liquidity and high price impact, making them prone to millisecond-scale flash crashes. Agent-based limit order book simulators are a natural tool for studying such events, but their behavioral parameters are usually hand-crafted or require full order book histories that are rarely available at scale. We propose a four-stage pipeline that constructs a reproducible 100 ms BTCUSDT flash-crash event panel from 66 detected events, elicits behavioral priors for four agent archetypes using an offline large language model conditioned on empirical microstructure anchors, instantiates a heterogeneous limit order book simulator with the validated priors, and applies causal discovery plus counterfactual analysis to the resulting synthetic panel. Across 500 simulation runs, LLM-elicited priors produce a crash rate of 0.176 versus 0.008 under uninformative uniform priors and generate heav- ier return tails. In the frozen counterfactual analysis, reducing leverage amplification by one within-sample standard deviation lowers the predicted crash rate from 0.176 to 0.136, whereas reducing directional pressure yields only a marginal change. These find- ings suggest that empirically anchored LLM elicitation can improve simulator fidelity and help identify plausible crash-amplification mechanisms in a controlled synthetic environment
Applications (stat.AP); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Trading and Market Microstructure (q-fin.TR)
arXiv:2611.03660 [stat.AP]
(or arXiv:2611.03660v1 [stat.AP] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.03660 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 291 words