Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research proposes Behavior-Driven Explainability (BDX), a method that translates structured behavioral scenarios into system explanations to enhance trust in safety-critical designs like RISC-V processors. By leveraging existing specification frameworks rather than relying solely on post-hoc analysis of neural networks, the approach addresses explainability needs across diverse software engineering and hardware architecture contexts. While relevant to AI interpretability principles, the core contribution lies in formal methods for system verification where machine learning is not the primary mechanism being analyzed or improved.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Behavior-Driven Explainability

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.24881v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As system complexity has vastly increased, it has become significantly more challenging for a single person or a team to fully understand all aspects of an entire system. Particularly, this holds when considering all the different stages of a system's development life cycle, such as, e.g., design or maintenance. But especially for safety-critical systems it is essential that the final design can be trusted. Because of this, explainability is becoming an important requirement for modern systems. In this paper, we aim to achieve this goal by utilizing Behavior-Driven Development (BDD), where the expected system behavior is given in the form of structured scenarios. These scenarios give a sequence of actions for each functionality, and by this can be directly translated into explanations. We introduce this method of deriving explanations based on the specification as Behavior-Driven Explainability (BDX). While applicable at any development stage or abstraction level, a case study for the explanation of exceptions in a RISC-V processor shows the support this concept adds during system design.

Abstract:As system complexity has vastly increased, it has become significantly more challenging for a single person or a team to fully understand all aspects of an entire system. Particularly, this holds when considering all the different stages of a system's development life cycle, such as, e.g., design or maintenance. But especially for safety-critical systems it is essential that the final design can be trusted. Because of this, explainability is becoming an important requirement for modern systems. In this paper, we aim to achieve this goal by utilizing Behavior-Driven Development (BDD), where the expected system behavior is given in the form of structured scenarios. These scenarios give a sequence of actions for each functionality, and by this can be directly translated into explanations. We introduce this method of deriving explanations based on the specification as Behavior-Driven Explainability (BDX). While applicable at any development stage or abstraction level, a case study for the explanation of exceptions in a RISC-V processor shows the support this concept adds during system design.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Hardware Architecture (cs.AR); Software Engineering (cs.SE)

D.2.1; D.2.3; D.2.4; B.5.2; B.8.2

arXiv:2607.24881 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.24881v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.24881 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 272 words

Related coverage