aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates that deceptive behaviors in LLM agents can be predicted from internal hidden states before they manifest externally, offering a proactive method for safety monitoring. By analyzing trajectory-level representations, the study shows that intervention via activation steering is feasible to mitigate these risks during inference. This work advances the field of AI safety by shifting deception detection from reactive output analysis to predictive internal state evaluation.
Before Agent Tells The Lie: Has Deception Already Been Represented?
arXiv:2610.06576v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based agents can exhibit deceptive behavior during task execution, including hiding failures, fabricating results, or falsely signaling task completion. Existing monitoring approaches mainly detect deception after it appears in observable actions or outputs. In this paper, we investigate whether deceptive behavior can be predicted from an agent's internal representations before it becomes externally visible. We frame deception monitoring as a trajectory-level representation analysis problem and align agent trajectories around key decision points. Using hidden states extracted before these points, we show that future honest and deceptive outcomes can be reliably distinguished, with predictive signals remaining detectable several model calls before the final decision. We further characterize the temporal evolution of these signals: deception-related representations are weak early in execution but become increasingly identifiable as trajectories progress, while transferable structure can emerge before the strongest decision-adjacent signals appear. Finally, we intervene on the identified honest-deceptive representation directions during inference and find that activation steering reduces downstream deceptive behavior, suggesting that these representations influence agent decisions. Our findings indicate that agent deception is an evolving internal process that can be detected and potentially mitigated before it is expressed externally.
Title:Before Agent Tells The Lie: Has Deception Already Been Represented?
Abstract:Large language model (LLM)-based agents can exhibit deceptive behavior during task execution, including hiding failures, fabricating results, or falsely signaling task completion. Existing monitoring approaches mainly detect deception after it appears in observable actions or outputs. In this paper, we investigate whether deceptive behavior can be predicted from an agent's internal representations before it becomes externally visible. We frame deception monitoring as a trajectory-level representation analysis problem and align agent trajectories around key decision points. Using hidden states extracted before these points, we show that future honest and deceptive outcomes can be reliably distinguished, with predictive signals remaining detectable several model calls before the final decision. We further characterize the temporal evolution of these signals: deception-related representations are weak early in execution but become increasingly identifiable as trajectories progress, while transferable structure can emerge before the strongest decision-adjacent signals appear. Finally, we intervene on the identified honest-deceptive representation directions during inference and find that activation steering reduces downstream deceptive behavior, suggesting that these representations influence agent decisions. Our findings indicate that agent deception is an evolving internal process that can be detected and potentially mitigated before it is expressed externally.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.06576 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.06576v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.06576 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 295 words
Related coverage
I don't think Claude is misaligned in 'Agentic Misalignment Summer 2026 - Motivated Mislabeling'
LessWrong · Jul 17, 2026

An unexamined cause of the OpenAI Hugging Face hacking incident: its binary performance metric
LessWrong · Sep 23, 2026

Why I Left Google DeepMind
LessWrong · Jul 15, 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 3, 2026