aiqbench analysis
This paper presents a novel constrained Bayesian optimisation method designed to handle highly anisotropic feasible sets in engineering design problems involving partial differential equations. By pre-computing control sets that maintain state observables within tolerance, the approach efficiently generates well-spread candidates for complex applications like Tokamak divertor optimisation. The technique advances the field of machine learning by addressing specific challenges in state-dependent constraint satisfaction without relying on standard feasibility models.
Bayesian Optimisation under State-Preservation Constraints
arXiv:2610.12150v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In many engineering design problems, the objective and constraints depend on the state: the solution of a PDE determined by the design parameters. We consider improving a design while holding selected state observables near trusted values, which we call state preservation constraints. Constrained Bayesian optimisation handles these with a learnt feasibility model, but struggles with this problem's highly anisotropic feasible set. Our central idea is to pre-compute the set of controls whose linearised constraint response stays within tolerance, thereby pulling back the state-space constraint into design space. This linearisation defines an ellipsoid from which we can efficiently draw a large number of well-spread candidates. The underlying linear response map is refined online, and the ellipsoid is rebuilt accordingly. We demonstrate the method end-to-end on our key application - Tokamak divertor optimisation under plasma-boundary preservation.
Abstract:In many engineering design problems, the objective and constraints depend on the state: the solution of a PDE determined by the design parameters. We consider improving a design while holding selected state observables near trusted values, which we call state preservation constraints. Constrained Bayesian optimisation handles these with a learnt feasibility model, but struggles with this problem's highly anisotropic feasible set. Our central idea is to pre-compute the set of controls whose linearised constraint response stays within tolerance, thereby pulling back the state-space constraint into design space. This linearisation defines an ellipsoid from which we can efficiently draw a large number of well-spread candidates. The underlying linear response map is refined online, and the ellipsoid is rebuilt accordingly. We demonstrate the method end-to-end on our key application - Tokamak divertor optimisation under plasma-boundary preservation.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.12150 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.12150v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.12150 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 226 words
Related coverage

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 6, 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

Korea University Team Presents LLM-Qubo Framework for Multi-Drone Assignment Optimisation
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jun 17, 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026