Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates the limitations of standard compression in multi-agent LLM systems, demonstrating that "Bayes-sufficient" summaries can fail if the executor cannot interpret the surface form of the message. The study quantifies the trade-off between protocol overhead and information loss, revealing specific failure modes where correct content recovery does not translate to successful action closure. These findings provide a framework for selecting communication strategies that optimize the accuracy-cost frontier in complex agent coordination tasks.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Bayes-Sufficient Compression Is Not Enough: How Does Communication Help Multi-Agent Systems?

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.03769v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent LLM systems pair a sender with broad context and an executor with a limited local view. We study when a short message improves the executor's next decision, when raw context is preferable, and when a stronger sender helps. Our framework, \emph{receiver-relative bounded coordination}, expresses message utility as receiver gain minus protocol tax. Compression beats raw context when tax savings exceed losses from omitted information and decoder mismatch. Even \emph{Bayes-sufficient} compression can fail when a bounded executor cannot use its surface form. A three-stage decomposition separates externalization, absorption, and \emph{action closure}, explaining how errors remain after the correct content reaches the receiver. Under a single-crossing condition, sender upgrades help above a receiver-burden threshold. Across six benchmarks, the same Qwen protocol raises ContextBench joint accuracy from $0.633$ to $0.775$ but lowers ToolSandbox from $0.889$ to $0.653$. Fixed-message replay reveals closure failures despite correct artifact recovery. These results guide an inference-time selector that improves the accuracy-cost frontier on the evaluated communication regimes.

Title:Bayes-Sufficient Compression Is Not Enough: How Does Communication Help Multi-Agent Systems?

Abstract:Multi-agent LLM systems pair a sender with broad context and an executor with a limited local view. We study when a short message improves the executor's next decision, when raw context is preferable, and when a stronger sender helps. Our framework, \emph{receiver-relative bounded coordination}, expresses message utility as receiver gain minus protocol tax. Compression beats raw context when tax savings exceed losses from omitted information and decoder mismatch. Even \emph{Bayes-sufficient} compression can fail when a bounded executor cannot use its surface form. A three-stage decomposition separates externalization, absorption, and \emph{action closure}, explaining how errors remain after the correct content reaches the receiver. Under a single-crossing condition, sender upgrades help above a receiver-burden threshold. Across six benchmarks, the same Qwen protocol raises ContextBench joint accuracy from $0.633$ to $0.775$ but lowers ToolSandbox from $0.889$ to $0.653$. Fixed-message replay reveals closure failures despite correct artifact recovery. These results guide an inference-time selector that improves the accuracy-cost frontier on the evaluated communication regimes.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Information Theory (cs.IT); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)

arXiv:2610.03769 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.03769v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.03769 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 271 words

Related coverage