aiqbench analysis
BaRe-Mem introduces a Bayesian reliability memory mechanism that dynamically adjusts multi-agent consultation by leveraging internal belief representations to filter misleading information. This approach demonstrates superior robustness compared to standard debate or majority voting methods, particularly when advisor capabilities vary across tasks. The technique also extends to optimizing worker allocation within agent teams, enhancing overall task completion rates on complex benchmarks.
BaRe-Mem: Bayesian Reliability Memory for Robust and Adaptive Agent Consultation
arXiv:2609.35551v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In multi-agent systems, reliable consultation is challenging because advisor capabilities vary across tasks, and misleading information can make consultation worse than autonomous reasoning. We introduce BaRe-Mem, an online Bayesian reliability memory for multi-agent consultation. It estimates advisor reliability based on the central model's internal belief representations and updates these estimates from historical interactions. These estimates modulate the influence of advisor responses and guide the choice between consultation and autonomous reasoning. Across nine benchmarks and six central models, BaRe-Mem is more robust to misleading advisor information than debate and majority voting. On the more challenging tasks, it remains above autonomous reasoning across all tested misleading levels. Moreover, we extend the BaRe-Mem mechanism to worker allocation in agent teams. On the MuSiQue benchmark, BaRe-Mem improves task completion over routing by historical success counts and identifies capable workers earlier.
Abstract:In multi-agent systems, reliable consultation is challenging because advisor capabilities vary across tasks, and misleading information can make consultation worse than autonomous reasoning. We introduce BaRe-Mem, an online Bayesian reliability memory for multi-agent consultation. It estimates advisor reliability based on the central model's internal belief representations and updates these estimates from historical interactions. These estimates modulate the influence of advisor responses and guide the choice between consultation and autonomous reasoning. Across nine benchmarks and six central models, BaRe-Mem is more robust to misleading advisor information than debate and majority voting. On the more challenging tasks, it remains above autonomous reasoning across all tested misleading levels. Moreover, we extend the BaRe-Mem mechanism to worker allocation in agent teams. On the MuSiQue benchmark, BaRe-Mem improves task completion over routing by historical success counts and identifies capable workers earlier.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.35551 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.35551v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35551 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 230 words
Related coverage

Game-Theoretic Disempowerment: Loss of Control to Agencyless AI
LessWrong · Sep 27, 2026

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026