Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper presents TRIAD, an automated framework for generating domain-specific evaluation datasets tailored to Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. By integrating a feedback loop validator with relevance-labeled contexts, the method effectively addresses the limitations of general-purpose benchmarks like HotpotQA in proprietary settings. The approach offers a practical solution for rigorously assessing multi-hop query performance and unanswerable question handling without relying solely on Wikipedia-based knowledge.
Sources coveringarXiv, AWS, LessWrong, Latent Space
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Automating Multi-Hop RAG Evaluation via TRIAD: From Context Extraction to Validated Dataset Generation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.21558v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in LLMs and the adoption of RAG systems in industry have created a need for domain-specific question-answer datasets that can assess RAG performance on proprietary data. Existing datasets, such as HotpotQA, challenge current RAG systems on Wikipedia-based knowledge, but they cannot be transferred directly to domain-specific settings. A comprehensive evaluation of RAG system quality requires both multi-hop queries and unanswerable questions. This paper introduces TRIAD, a three-stage automated dataset generation approach. First, it generates question--answer (QA) pairs for the domain-specific knowledge base of a RAG system. Second, a validator checks each QA-pair in a feedback loop. Third, the QA pairs are extended with relevance-labeled context documents for downstream evaluation. We evaluate this approach against the established MuSiQue and HotpotQA datasets. The results show that the generated dataset exhibits similar performance trends across different RAG setups, while human validation indicates that the questions are suitable for evaluating a domain-specific RAG system. The code used to generate the dataset and all validation results are available in our GitHub repository(https://github.com/lorenzbrehme/triad).

Abstract:Recent advances in LLMs and the adoption of RAG systems in industry have created a need for domain-specific question-answer datasets that can assess RAG performance on proprietary data. Existing datasets, such as HotpotQA, challenge current RAG systems on Wikipedia-based knowledge, but they cannot be transferred directly to domain-specific settings. A comprehensive evaluation of RAG system quality requires both multi-hop queries and unanswerable questions. This paper introduces TRIAD, a three-stage automated dataset generation approach. First, it generates question--answer (QA) pairs for the domain-specific knowledge base of a RAG system. Second, a validator checks each QA-pair in a feedback loop. Third, the QA pairs are extended with relevance-labeled context documents for downstream evaluation. We evaluate this approach against the established MuSiQue and HotpotQA datasets. The results show that the generated dataset exhibits similar performance trends across different RAG setups, while human validation indicates that the questions are suitable for evaluating a domain-specific RAG system. The code used to generate the dataset and all validation results are available in our GitHub repository(this https URL).

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2608.21558 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2608.21558v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.21558 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 269 words

Related coverage