Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces an automated pipeline that combines deterministic trajectory analysis with vision-language reasoning to generate semantically meaningful labels for bimanual mobile manipulation tasks. By effectively segmenting kinematic signals and aggregating outputs across multiple limbs, the method achieves high acceptance rates for temporal and body part annotations in real-world scenarios. The approach significantly advances the ability to create structured datasets necessary for training long-horizon robotic policies with rich semantic context.
Sources coveringarXiv, Fortune, AWS, Quantum Zeitgeist
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Automatic Labelling for Bimanual Mobile Manipulation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.24059v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Semantically meaningful subtask labels can provide useful contexts for long-horizon policies, but automatically identifying both reliable temporal boundaries and broad semantic descriptions for annotations remains difficult. We present an automatic labelling pipeline that assigns temporal localisation to deterministic trajectory analysis and semantic interpretation to vision-language (VL) reasoning. The pipeline segments synchronised kinematic signals into phases, performs phase-localised VL reasoning to describe the contents, and aggregates the outputs for the base, left arm, and right arm actions. We evaluate this pipeline primarily on 29 real Galaxea bimanual mobile-manipulation tasks. Repeating the VL reasoning three times first produces the same output value for 87.4% on selected tasks. A review by nine participants across all 29 tasks then judgements on the labelled phases and shows positive acceptance of temporal divisions (90.5%), body labels (90.7%), and arm labels (78.7%). The results indicate that the segmentation-VL design can produce structured annotations while preserving asynchronous bimanual behaviour, providing a basis for richer semantic subtask identification and state-based verification.

Abstract:Semantically meaningful subtask labels can provide useful contexts for long-horizon policies, but automatically identifying both reliable temporal boundaries and broad semantic descriptions for annotations remains difficult. We present an automatic labelling pipeline that assigns temporal localisation to deterministic trajectory analysis and semantic interpretation to vision-language (VL) reasoning. The pipeline segments synchronised kinematic signals into phases, performs phase-localised VL reasoning to describe the contents, and aggregates the outputs for the base, left arm, and right arm actions. We evaluate this pipeline primarily on 29 real Galaxea bimanual mobile-manipulation tasks. Repeating the VL reasoning three times first produces the same output value for 87.4% on selected tasks. A review by nine participants across all 29 tasks then judgements on the labelled phases and shows positive acceptance of temporal divisions (90.5%), body labels (90.7%), and arm labels (78.7%). The results indicate that the segmentation-VL design can produce structured annotations while preserving asynchronous bimanual behaviour, providing a basis for richer semantic subtask identification and state-based verification.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.24059 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.24059v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.24059 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 255 words

Related coverage