aiqbench analysis
This empirical study demonstrates that while Large Language Models can effectively automate the summarization of financial news, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) introduces significant risks like hallucination and repetition in smaller open-source models. The research highlights a critical trade-off where simpler chain-of-thought methods outperformed complex RAG pipelines for this specific task, offering valuable insights for building reliable AI-driven financial analysis tools.
Automated Summarization of Financial News Using Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation: An Early Empirical Study (Fall 2023)
arXiv:2608.19526v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Stock market analysts and investors face a daily challenge: too much financial news, too little time. Manually reading and synthesizing hundreds of company-specific articles is impractical, yet missing key information can directly affect investment decisions. This project, conducted at George Washington University in Fall 2023, explores whether Large Language Models can automate this process reliably. We built a pipeline that pulls news articles from the News API, company background from Wikipedia, and stock price data from Yahoo Finance for ten major companies (AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL, AMZN, META, TSLA, JPM, NVDA, WMT, DIS). Because LLMs cannot directly process numerical tables, we developed a simple but effective template that converts stock data into natural language narratives. We then tested two summarization approaches (Summarize Chains and Retrieval-Augmented Generation with FAISS) across three open-source models (Falcon-7B-Instruct, DistilBART-CNN-12-6, BART-Large-XSum) for news, and GPT (text-davinci-003) for stock summaries. Falcon-7B with Summarize Chains gave the best results, covering all news events accurately and coherently. RAG, while promising in theory, caused severe repetition in Falcon and hallucinated facts in BART-Large when k was large. Both LLM-based approaches outperformed a simple Lead-3 baseline on ROUGE-1. We also built a Streamlit dashboard for interactive stock visualization. The work was done in Fall 2023, before RAG-based financial tools became widespread, and the failure modes we document, particularly hallucination under RAG in smaller models, remain relevant today.
Abstract:Stock market analysts and investors face a daily challenge: too much financial news, too little time. Manually reading and synthesizing hundreds of company-specific articles is impractical, yet missing key information can directly affect investment decisions. This project, conducted at George Washington University in Fall 2023, explores whether Large Language Models can automate this process reliably. We built a pipeline that pulls news articles from the News API, company background from Wikipedia, and stock price data from Yahoo Finance for ten major companies (AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL, AMZN, META, TSLA, JPM, NVDA, WMT, DIS). Because LLMs cannot directly process numerical tables, we developed a simple but effective template that converts stock data into natural language narratives. We then tested two summarization approaches (Summarize Chains and Retrieval-Augmented Generation with FAISS) across three open-source models (Falcon-7B-Instruct, DistilBART-CNN-12-6, BART-Large-XSum) for news, and GPT (text-davinci-003) for stock summaries. Falcon-7B with Summarize Chains gave the best results, covering all news events accurately and coherently. RAG, while promising in theory, caused severe repetition in Falcon and hallucinated facts in BART-Large when k was large. Both LLM-based approaches outperformed a simple Lead-3 baseline on ROUGE-1. We also built a Streamlit dashboard for interactive stock visualization. The work was done in Fall 2023, before RAG-based financial tools became widespread, and the failure modes we document, particularly hallucination under RAG in smaller models, remain relevant today.
17 pages, 1 figure, 6 tables. Research conducted Fall 2023 at George Washington University; manuscript prepared for public release in 2026
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
I.2.7; H.3.3; J.4
arXiv:2608.19526 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.19526v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19526 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 350 words
Related coverage
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026

NVIDIA Blackwell Sets STAC-AI Record for LLM Inference in Finance
NVIDIA · May 27, 2026

Presentation: Designing AI Platforms for Reliability: Tools for Certainty, Agents for Discovery
InfoQ · May 27, 2026

Announcing the 2026 Databricks Customer Awards Industry winners
Databricks · Jun 9, 2026