Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This study presents CoTI, a multi-agent LLM framework that significantly improves the efficiency and consistency of qualitative thematic analysis in healthcare by generating codes and themes comparable to senior investigators. The research highlights the system's ability to scale labor-intensive manual processes while offering insights into human-AI collaboration dynamics, specifically noting potential risks of over-reliance by less experienced users.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Automated Healthcare Thematic Analysis using Multi-Agent Large Language Model: Algorithm Development and Evaluation

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2512.16063v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Understanding patients experiences is essential for advancing patient-centered care. Qualitative thematic analysis is widely used to explore these experiences, however, the process remains labor-intensive, subjective, and difficult to scale. This study aimed to develop and evaluate Collaborative Theme Identification Agent (CoTI), a multi-agent large language model framework designed to support manual thematic analysis by rapidly generating supporting excerpts, initial codes, and themes. CoTI consists of three agents: Instructor, Thematizer, and CodebookGenerator. The Instructor refines instruction prompts, the Thematizer extracts supporting excerpts and generates initial codes for each transcript, and the CodebookGenerator groups similar codes across all transcripts into a codebook with themes. We evaluated CoTI primarily using 12 heart failure patient transcripts. CoTI-generated outputs were compared against the reference standard developed by senior investigators. To explore human-AI interaction in thematic analysis, we further implemented CoTI in a user-facing application. CoTI generated supporting excerpts, initial codes, and themes that were more similar to those of senior investigators than did the outputs of junior investigators, baseline natural language processing models, and other basic large language models. In an exploratory human-AI collaboration experiment, we found that the collaboration between CoTI and junior investigators provided only marginal gains compared to CoTI alone. A possible hypothesis was that junior investigators may over-rely on CoTI and limit their independent critical thinking. CoTI can improve the efficiency of thematic analysis by rapidly generating supporting excerpts, initial codes, and themes for human researchers review. These findings highlight CoTI potential as a useful tool for scalable qualitative research.

Abstract:Understanding patients experiences is essential for advancing patient-centered care. Qualitative thematic analysis is widely used to explore these experiences, however, the process remains labor-intensive, subjective, and difficult to scale. This study aimed to develop and evaluate Collaborative Theme Identification Agent (CoTI), a multi-agent large language model framework designed to support manual thematic analysis by rapidly generating supporting excerpts, initial codes, and themes. CoTI consists of three agents: Instructor, Thematizer, and CodebookGenerator. The Instructor refines instruction prompts, the Thematizer extracts supporting excerpts and generates initial codes for each transcript, and the CodebookGenerator groups similar codes across all transcripts into a codebook with themes. We evaluated CoTI primarily using 12 heart failure patient transcripts. CoTI-generated outputs were compared against the reference standard developed by senior investigators. To explore human-AI interaction in thematic analysis, we further implemented CoTI in a user-facing application. CoTI generated supporting excerpts, initial codes, and themes that were more similar to those of senior investigators than did the outputs of junior investigators, baseline natural language processing models, and other basic large language models. In an exploratory human-AI collaboration experiment, we found that the collaboration between CoTI and junior investigators provided only marginal gains compared to CoTI alone. A possible hypothesis was that junior investigators may over-rely on CoTI and limit their independent critical thinking. CoTI can improve the efficiency of thematic analysis by rapidly generating supporting excerpts, initial codes, and themes for human researchers review. These findings highlight CoTI potential as a useful tool for scalable qualitative research.

Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2512.16063 [cs.HC]

(or arXiv:2512.16063v2 [cs.HC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.16063 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 344 words

Related coverage