aiqbench analysis
This research introduces ATTRICITE, a 4B-parameter model specifically fine-tuned to recover cited sources from scientific passages, marking a significant step toward faithful AI attribution. By leveraging the CITEALIGN dataset and GRPO fine-tuning, the model demonstrates that smaller architectures can effectively identify intended references within complex literature, challenging the assumption that massive parameter counts are required for this specific task. The release of the model and collection pipeline supports reproducible research into how AI systems can accurately trace claims back to their original sources in an evolving scientific landscape.
ATTRICITE: Training an Open 4B Model for Citation Recovery toward Faithful Attribution
arXiv:2609.14248v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Faithful citation attribution begins with identifying the intended source for a scientific claim. We study this source-identification capability through citation recovery: recovering the paper cited by the original author from a citation-bearing passage. Our evaluation adopts the published author's citation as an observable human attribution signal and uses target recovery as a proxy for progress toward faithful attribution. We introduce ATTRICITE, an open 4B-parameter model trained for tool-using citation recovery within the CiteGuard retrieval environment, together with CITEALIGN, a 7,607-instance computer-science dataset drawn from recent scientific literature. For controlled evaluation, we construct a 709-instance benchmark subset of CITEALIGN, comprising 410 development instances from 2024 publications and 299 temporally held-out test instances from 2025 publications. Across three runs at an inference temperature of 0.7, GRPO fine-tuning improves Qwen3-4B from 49.4%$\pm$1.5% to 59.8%$\pm$0.2% target-match accuracy, a gain of 10.4 percentage points. Despite using only 4B parameters, ATTRICITE outperforms gpt-oss-20b and comes within 3.9 points of GPT-5.4-mini, while Gemma 4 31B IT achieves the strongest overall performance at 72.0%$\pm$1.0%. We release the model and collection pipeline https://github.com/KathCYM/AttriCite to support reproducible research on citation recovery toward faithful attribution in a continually evolving scientific literature.
Abstract:Faithful citation attribution begins with identifying the intended source for a scientific claim. We study this source-identification capability through citation recovery: recovering the paper cited by the original author from a citation-bearing passage. Our evaluation adopts the published author's citation as an observable human attribution signal and uses target recovery as a proxy for progress toward faithful attribution. We introduce ATTRICITE, an open 4B-parameter model trained for tool-using citation recovery within the CiteGuard retrieval environment, together with CITEALIGN, a 7,607-instance computer-science dataset drawn from recent scientific literature. For controlled evaluation, we construct a 709-instance benchmark subset of CITEALIGN, comprising 410 development instances from 2024 publications and 299 temporally held-out test instances from 2025 publications. Across three runs at an inference temperature of 0.7, GRPO fine-tuning improves Qwen3-4B from 49.4%$\pm$1.5% to 59.8%$\pm$0.2% target-match accuracy, a gain of 10.4 percentage points. Despite using only 4B parameters, ATTRICITE outperforms gpt-oss-20b and comes within 3.9 points of GPT-5.4-mini, while Gemma 4 31B IT achieves the strongest overall performance at 72.0%$\pm$1.0%. We release the model and collection pipeline this https URL to support reproducible research on citation recovery toward faithful attribution in a continually evolving scientific literature.
Digital Libraries (cs.DL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.14248 [cs.DL]
(or arXiv:2609.14248v1 [cs.DL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.14248 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 289 words
Related coverage

Game-Theoretic Disempowerment: Loss of Control to Agencyless AI
LessWrong · Sep 27, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026