Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes theoretical bounds for sparse attention mechanisms by optimizing the tradeoff between MIPS index counts and retrieved keys, directly addressing efficiency bottlenecks in long-context LLM inference. By unifying existing methods under priority sampling and demonstrating superior scaling compared to top-$k$ approaches, the work provides a rigorous foundation for reducing computational costs in large-scale language models.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Attention via Black-Box Vector Search

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.10135v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sparse attention mechanisms estimate attention over $n$ tokens using a small subset of keys. Many existing approaches use maximum inner product search (MIPS) to retrieve the heaviest keys, which motivates the following question: given black-box access to a MIPS oracle, how many keys must be retrieved to output an $\varepsilon$-accurate attention estimate? We answer this question by unifying prior approaches through the framework of priority sampling. With a single MIPS index, we show that $\Theta(\sqrt{n}/\varepsilon)$ retrieved keys are both sufficient and necessary. With $\Theta(\log n)$ indices, we give an algorithm that retrieves only $O(\log n+1/\varepsilon^2)$ keys and prove that this is near-optimal. More generally, we design algorithms that establish a smooth tradeoff between the number of MIPS indices and number of retrieved keys. We then show that if we allow augmentation of keys and queries, we can bypass the above lower bounds: there exists a simple priority-sampling estimator using a single MIPS index and $O(1/\varepsilon^2)$ retrieved keys. When integrated into LLM inference, our algorithms outperform top-$k$ and sampling approaches used in prior work and yield attention approximation that scales favorably to long contexts.

Abstract:Sparse attention mechanisms estimate attention over $n$ tokens using a small subset of keys. Many existing approaches use maximum inner product search (MIPS) to retrieve the heaviest keys, which motivates the following question: given black-box access to a MIPS oracle, how many keys must be retrieved to output an $\varepsilon$-accurate attention estimate? We answer this question by unifying prior approaches through the framework of priority sampling. With a single MIPS index, we show that $\Theta(\sqrt{n}/\varepsilon)$ retrieved keys are both sufficient and necessary. With $\Theta(\log n)$ indices, we give an algorithm that retrieves only $O(\log n+1/\varepsilon^2)$ keys and prove that this is near-optimal. More generally, we design algorithms that establish a smooth tradeoff between the number of MIPS indices and number of retrieved keys. We then show that if we allow augmentation of keys and queries, we can bypass the above lower bounds: there exists a simple priority-sampling estimator using a single MIPS index and $O(1/\varepsilon^2)$ retrieved keys. When integrated into LLM inference, our algorithms outperform top-$k$ and sampling approaches used in prior work and yield attention approximation that scales favorably to long contexts.

Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.10135 [cs.DS]

(or arXiv:2610.10135v1 [cs.DS] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.10135 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 282 words

Related coverage