aiqbench analysis
This comparative study provides critical empirical data on the reliability of LLMs like ChatGPT for automated content moderation, specifically regarding the detection of targeting and inappropriate language. The findings highlight that while model upgrades (e.g., moving to GPT-4) yield significant performance gains, prompt engineering offers diminishing returns once a baseline is established, and stability remains an issue for specific sub-tasks like identifying targeting speech. For practitioners building safety layers, this underscores the necessity of rigorous benchmarking against expert judgments rather than relying solely on iterative prompt tuning.
Assessing and Refining ChatGPT's Performance in Identifying Targeting and Inappropriate Language: A Comparative Study
arXiv:2505.21710v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This study evaluates the effectiveness of ChatGPT, an advanced AI model for natural language processing, in identifying targeting and inappropriate language in online comments. With the increasing challenge of moderating vast volumes of user-generated content on social network sites, the role of AI in content moderation has gained prominence. We compared ChatGPT's performance against crowd-sourced annotations and expert evaluations to assess its accuracy, scope of detection, and consistency. Our findings show that ChatGPT performs well in detecting inappropriate content, and that almost the entire gain from iterative prompt refinement came from a single change --- simplifying the label scheme and moving to GPT-4 --- after which further adjustments to prompt structure and sampling temperature had little effect. Its performance on targeting language was weaker and less stable, with higher false positive rates than expert judgments before refinement and higher false negative rates after a change of model. This study contributes to the field by demonstrating the potential of AI models like ChatGPT to enhance automated content moderation systems while also identifying areas for further improvement. The results underscore the importance of careful prompt design and model selection, and of contextual understanding, in supporting automated moderation and mitigating harmful online behavior.
Abstract:This study evaluates the effectiveness of ChatGPT, an advanced AI model for natural language processing, in identifying targeting and inappropriate language in online comments. With the increasing challenge of moderating vast volumes of user-generated content on social network sites, the role of AI in content moderation has gained prominence. We compared ChatGPT's performance against crowd-sourced annotations and expert evaluations to assess its accuracy, scope of detection, and consistency. Our findings show that ChatGPT performs well in detecting inappropriate content, and that almost the entire gain from iterative prompt refinement came from a single change --- simplifying the label scheme and moving to GPT-4 --- after which further adjustments to prompt structure and sampling temperature had little effect. Its performance on targeting language was weaker and less stable, with higher false positive rates than expert judgments before refinement and higher false negative rates after a change of model. This study contributes to the field by demonstrating the potential of AI models like ChatGPT to enhance automated content moderation systems while also identifying areas for further improvement. The results underscore the importance of careful prompt design and model selection, and of contextual understanding, in supporting automated moderation and mitigating harmful online behavior.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2505.21710 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2505.21710v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.21710 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 293 words
Related coverage
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 13, 2026
[AINews] AI Engineer NYC: Gemini 4 Argon, Vals AI Benchmarks
Latent Space · Oct 14, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026

Promptimus: Improving already good LLM prompts with zero manual engineering
Amazon Science · May 14, 2026