Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces QIME, a novel framework that grounds interpretable text embeddings in explicit biomedical ontology questions rather than opaque dense vectors. By aligning embedding dimensions with specific yes/no domain queries, the method significantly improves transparency and performance on biomedical clustering and retrieval tasks while reducing cognitive load for researchers. The approach effectively bridges the gap between high-performing black-box models and human-understandable representations in specialized scientific domains.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Asking the Right Questions: Ontology-Grounded Interpretable Embeddings for Biomedical Text

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2603.01690v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While dense biomedical embeddings achieve strong performance, their opaque dimensions limit transparency in biomedical NLP. Recent question-based interpretable embeddings represent text through binary answers to natural-language questions, but existing approaches rely primarily on corpus-driven signals, often capturing topical or stylistic differences rather than fine-grained biomedical distinctions. We propose QIME, an ontology-grounded framework for interpretable biomedical text embeddings in which each dimension corresponds to an explicit biomedical-domain yes/no question. QIME leverages a biomedical ontology to guide contrastive question generation from semantic clusters, producing atomic, domain-grounded questions. It constructs embeddings via similarity-based semantic activation with MMR-based diversity-aware dimension selection, yielding sparse representations efficiently. Experiments on biomedical clustering, STS and retrieval benchmarks show that QIME consistently outperforms prior interpretable embedding methods and substantially narrows the gap to strong black-box biomedical encoders. It also imposes substantially lower cognitive burden than existing methods, providing concise and domain-specific interpretations. The code is available at https://github.com/L1nzh/QIME.

Abstract:While dense biomedical embeddings achieve strong performance, their opaque dimensions limit transparency in biomedical NLP. Recent question-based interpretable embeddings represent text through binary answers to natural-language questions, but existing approaches rely primarily on corpus-driven signals, often capturing topical or stylistic differences rather than fine-grained biomedical distinctions. We propose QIME, an ontology-grounded framework for interpretable biomedical text embeddings in which each dimension corresponds to an explicit biomedical-domain yes/no question. QIME leverages a biomedical ontology to guide contrastive question generation from semantic clusters, producing atomic, domain-grounded questions. It constructs embeddings via similarity-based semantic activation with MMR-based diversity-aware dimension selection, yielding sparse representations efficiently. Experiments on biomedical clustering, STS and retrieval benchmarks show that QIME consistently outperforms prior interpretable embedding methods and substantially narrows the gap to strong black-box biomedical encoders. It also imposes substantially lower cognitive burden than existing methods, providing concise and domain-specific interpretations. The code is available at this https URL.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2603.01690 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2603.01690v3 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.01690 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 247 words

Related coverage