Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses a critical bottleneck in autonomous agent development by replacing brittle screenshot-based GUI interaction with a structured, semantic interface called ASIL. By exposing applications through JSON observations and executable actions, the method significantly improves task success rates and reduces action counts compared to traditional computer vision approaches. The study also demonstrates that this structured modality accelerates model training for existing LLMs like Qwen3.5, offering a more efficient path toward robust software-operating agents.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

ASIL: Replacing Screenshot-and-Click with Structured State and Semantic Actions

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.26991v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Powerful code agents can execute scripts, call tools, and manage files, yet many important applications remain accessible primarily through graphical user interfaces. We argue that screenshot-and-click is an inefficient interface for software-operating agents: screenshots are state-incomplete, and GUI actions are brittle, semantically weak, and poorly matched to long-horizon planning. We introduce ASIL (Agent-Software Interaction Layer), an agent-native interface that exposes software through structured JSON observations and code-executable semantic actions, realized through the deepest feasible access path for each application. We instantiate ASIL across 15 applications and a benchmark of 300 single-application and 80 multi-application tasks. ASIL reaches above 80 with closed models while executing fewer than five actions per task. Under a repaired runtime and a 50-step screenshot budget, the same tasks yield 6.6 and 26.6 strict success under screenshot-and-click control, rising to 15.0 and 53.3 on an easier OSWorld-comparable band. Against application-native interfaces on matched tasks, ASIL exceeds LibreOffice's UNO API by 28-38 strict points but only matches draw.io's MCP content contract. The structured modality also suits training: small-scale SFT raises Qwen3.5-2B from 58.0 to 72.1 and Qwen3.5-9B from 66.6 to 80.4, and resource-limited on-policy RL further raises them to 74.4 and 82.2.

Abstract:Powerful code agents can execute scripts, call tools, and manage files, yet many important applications remain accessible primarily through graphical user interfaces. We argue that screenshot-and-click is an inefficient interface for software-operating agents: screenshots are state-incomplete, and GUI actions are brittle, semantically weak, and poorly matched to long-horizon planning. We introduce ASIL (Agent-Software Interaction Layer), an agent-native interface that exposes software through structured JSON observations and code-executable semantic actions, realized through the deepest feasible access path for each application. We instantiate ASIL across 15 applications and a benchmark of 300 single-application and 80 multi-application tasks. ASIL reaches above 80 with closed models while executing fewer than five actions per task. Under a repaired runtime and a 50-step screenshot budget, the same tasks yield 6.6 and 26.6 strict success under screenshot-and-click control, rising to 15.0 and 53.3 on an easier OSWorld-comparable band. Against application-native interfaces on matched tasks, ASIL exceeds LibreOffice's UNO API by 28-38 strict points but only matches this http URL's MCP content contract. The structured modality also suits training: small-scale SFT raises Qwen3.5-2B from 58.0 to 72.1 and Qwen3.5-9B from 66.6 to 80.4, and resource-limited on-policy RL further raises them to 74.4 and 82.2.

Accepted to Findings of EMNLP 2026. 19 pages, 7 figures: 9-page main paper followed by limitations, ethics, acknowledgments, references, and appendices A-E. Project page: this https URL

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2608.26991 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2608.26991v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26991 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 241 words

Related coverage