aiqbench analysis
This research addresses a foundational ambiguity in quantum mechanics by extending arrival-time calculations to entangled multi-particle systems, moving beyond semi-classical approximations that fail in the near-field regime. The study proposes feasible experiments to distinguish between treating time as a classical parameter versus a quantum operator, with direct implications for developing advanced quantum technologies like temporal ghost imaging and non-local interferometry.
Arrival Time\textemdash Classical Parameter or Quantum Operator?
arXiv:2512.13502v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The question of how to interpret and compute arrival-time distributions in quantum mechanics remains unsettled, reflecting the longstanding tension between treating time as a quantum observable or as a classical parameter. While recent studies have primarily contrasted arrival-time predictions across different interpretations of quantum mechanics, here we investigate this ambiguity within the standard quantum-mechanical framework itself. Moreover, most previous studies have focused on the single-particle case in the far-field regime, where these distinct approaches yield very similar arrival-time distributions and a semi-classical analysis typically suffices. Recent advances in atom-optics technologies now make it possible to experimentally investigate arrival-time distributions for entangled multi-particle systems in the near-field regime, where a deeper analysis beyond semi-classical approximations is required. Even in the far-field regime, due to quantum non-locality, the semi-classical approximation cannot generally hold in multi-particle systems. Therefore, in this work, two fundamental approaches to the arrival-time problem---namely, the time-parameter and time-operator approaches---are extended to multi-particle systems. Using these extensions, we propose a feasible two-particle arrival-time experiment and numerically evaluate the corresponding joint distributions. Our results reveal regimes in which the two approaches yield inequivalent predictions, highlighting conditions under which experiments could shed new light on distinguishing between competing accounts of time in quantum mechanics. Our findings also provide important insights for the development of quantum technologies that use entanglement in the time domain, including non-local temporal interferometry, temporal ghost imaging, and temporal state tomography in multi-particle systems.
Title:Arrival Time\textemdash Classical Parameter or Quantum Operator?
Abstract:The question of how to interpret and compute arrival-time distributions in quantum mechanics remains unsettled, reflecting the longstanding tension between treating time as a quantum observable or as a classical parameter. While recent studies have primarily contrasted arrival-time predictions across different interpretations of quantum mechanics, here we investigate this ambiguity within the standard quantum-mechanical framework itself. Moreover, most previous studies have focused on the single-particle case in the far-field regime, where these distinct approaches yield very similar arrival-time distributions and a semi-classical analysis typically suffices. Recent advances in atom-optics technologies now make it possible to experimentally investigate arrival-time distributions for entangled multi-particle systems in the near-field regime, where a deeper analysis beyond semi-classical approximations is required. Even in the far-field regime, due to quantum non-locality, the semi-classical approximation cannot generally hold in multi-particle systems. Therefore, in this work, two fundamental approaches to the arrival-time problem---namely, the time-parameter and time-operator approaches---are extended to multi-particle systems. Using these extensions, we propose a feasible two-particle arrival-time experiment and numerically evaluate the corresponding joint distributions. Our results reveal regimes in which the two approaches yield inequivalent predictions, highlighting conditions under which experiments could shed new light on distinguishing between competing accounts of time in quantum mechanics. Our findings also provide important insights for the development of quantum technologies that use entanglement in the time domain, including non-local temporal interferometry, temporal ghost imaging, and temporal state tomography in multi-particle systems.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Atomic Physics (physics.atom-ph)
arXiv:2512.13502 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2512.13502v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.13502 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 337 words
Related coverage

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026

Security in the Post-Quantum Era, What Changes Once the Migration Is Done
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 11, 2026

AI and Quantum Computing Briefing
livetradingnews.com · Aug 4, 2026

Researchers Evaluate Quantum and Classical Models Achieving 90 Per Cent Digit Recognition Accuracy
Quantum Zeitgeist · May 30, 2026