Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

ARGUS demonstrates how integrating LLMs with structured event knowledge graphs can enhance reasoning over complex legal narratives, specifically in employment discrimination cases. By extracting causal and temporal relationships from unstructured court documents, this approach offers a significant improvement over standard linearized text representations for downstream classification tasks. The study highlights that while retrieval challenges remain, graph-structured data is highly effective for organizing evidence once relevant candidates are identified.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

ARGUS: Role-Aware Event Knowledge Graphs for U.S. Employment-Discrimination Complaints

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.30184v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: U.S. employment-discrimination complaints describe complex event sequences that are not explicitly captured by lexical or embedding-based representations alone. We present ARGUS, a source-grounded pipeline that combines a 5W1H-inspired schema, legal-domain models, and LLM-based structured generation to construct document-level Event Knowledge Graphs (EKGs) from CourtListener complaints. ARGUS extracts fact-bearing statements, builds chunk-level event graphs with participant, temporal, and causal structure, and merges them into document-level representations. We evaluate graph quality through human and multi-model assessment and test downstream utility on claim classification and legal QA. The graph-structured classifier outperforms raw and linearized baselines on the held-out set, and EKG-only retrieval improves document-scoped QA, while open-retrieval gains remain limited by low first-stage candidate recall. These results suggest that EKGs are most useful for organizing and reasoning over evidence once relevant material has been retrieved.

Title:ARGUS: Role-Aware Event Knowledge Graphs for U.S. Employment-Discrimination Complaints

Abstract:U.S. employment-discrimination complaints describe complex event sequences that are not explicitly captured by lexical or embedding-based representations alone. We present ARGUS, a source-grounded pipeline that combines a 5W1H-inspired schema, legal-domain models, and LLM-based structured generation to construct document-level Event Knowledge Graphs (EKGs) from CourtListener complaints. ARGUS extracts fact-bearing statements, builds chunk-level event graphs with participant, temporal, and causal structure, and merges them into document-level representations. We evaluate graph quality through human and multi-model assessment and test downstream utility on claim classification and legal QA. The graph-structured classifier outperforms raw and linearized baselines on the held-out set, and EKG-only retrieval improves document-scoped QA, while open-retrieval gains remain limited by low first-stage candidate recall. These results suggest that EKGs are most useful for organizing and reasoning over evidence once relevant material has been retrieved.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2609.30184 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.30184v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30184 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 236 words

Related coverage