aiqbench analysis
This study investigates internal representation structures in CNNs and LLMs by analyzing whether neural networks maintain coherent "conceptual separation" between related ideas. The research reveals that while familiar concepts form ordered representations, coherence degrades with unseen data or ambiguous topics, offering a new diagnostic metric beyond standard output accuracy. These findings provide critical insight into how models internally organize knowledge and their robustness to domain shifts.
Are You Thinking What I am Thinking?: Examining Conceptual Separation in Neural Architectures
arXiv:2609.00764v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural networks are increasingly employed to identify both well-defined and ambiguous concepts, yet output-level metrics reveal little about how those concepts are represented internally. Our study asks if these networks exhibit \textit{conceptual separation}: if examples of the same concept form coherent representations, and whether related concepts lie closer together in the representation space. We examine this conceptual organisation in Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) through geometric and distributional analysis of their internal activations. In CNNs, familiar ImageNet concepts form coherent and semantically ordered representations, while this coherence weakens for unseen concepts and suffers within-class domain shift. In LLMs, clearly distinct domains remain well separated, related subdomains move closer together, and the distinction between ambiguous topics collapses at both the mean and covariance level. These results suggest that conceptual separation can reveal structure that output accuracy alone cannot, and may serve as a useful diagnostic of how robustly a model represents the concepts it is asked to identify. Code and data available on \href{https://github.com/JaeeRoshniCapstoneProject/Are-You-Thinking-What-I-m-Thinking-Examining-Conceptual-Separation-in-Neural-Architectures}{GitHub}.
Title:Are You Thinking What I am Thinking? : Examining Conceptual Separation in Neural Architectures
Abstract:Neural networks are increasingly employed to identify both well-defined and ambiguous concepts, yet output-level metrics reveal little about how those concepts are represented internally. Our study asks if these networks exhibit \textit{conceptual separation}: if examples of the same concept form coherent representations, and whether related concepts lie closer together in the representation space. We examine this conceptual organisation in Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) through geometric and distributional analysis of their internal activations. In CNNs, familiar ImageNet concepts form coherent and semantically ordered representations, while this coherence weakens for unseen concepts and suffers within-class domain shift. In LLMs, clearly distinct domains remain well separated, related subdomains move closer together, and the distinction between ambiguous topics collapses at both the mean and covariance level. These results suggest that conceptual separation can reveal structure that output accuracy alone cannot, and may serve as a useful diagnostic of how robustly a model represents the concepts it is asked to identify. Code and data available on \href{this https URL}{GitHub}.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.00764 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.00764v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.00764 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 280 words
Related coverage
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026

Returning to ARC
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 4, 2026

[AINews] Agents disprove Polysemanticity; greatly improve Interpretability & Alignment
Latent Space · Oct 16, 2026