aiqbench analysis
This study reveals significant correlation (0.53) in verifier errors within Group-based Reinforcement Learning (GRPO) groups generated by Qwen2.5, challenging the assumption of independent sampling used in standard RLVR evaluations. The findings indicate that shared answer formats and prompt difficulties create clustering effects that reduce the effective sample size, necessitating more nuanced noise analysis beyond aggregate error rates for accurate model assessment.
Are Verifier Errors Independent Within a GRPO Group? Evidence from Qwen2.5 Rollouts
arXiv:2609.06386v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Group-based reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) scoresmultiple completions per prompt using automatic verifiers. Analysesbased on independent verifier errors may overlook dependence associatedwith shared answer formats. We investigate this dependence in24,998 groups of eight completions generated by Qwen2.5-1.5B onMATH, GSM8K, and DeepMath-103K. We estimate a pooled within-groupverifier-error correlation of 0.530 (95% confidence interval:0.500--0.560). Under an exchangeable-error model, this correspondsto a design-effect-adjusted effective sample size of 1.70 for aneight-completion group. Dependence varies substantially across answerforms: fractions, radicals, symbolic expressions, and intervals exhibitstronger clustering than unit annotations and percent signs. Replayinggroup-relative advantages across four rule-based verifier configurationsidentifies at least one advantage-sign disagreement in up to 0.83% ofgroups. Because a group is repeated sampling for one prompt, thiswithin-group clustering may reflect shared prompt difficulty as well asshared answer form, and we do not attempt to separate the two here.Unlike studies of correlated judgments across multiple evaluators, ouranalysis examines dependence across completions scored by the sameverifier. These findings motivate prompt- and answer-form-aware analysesof verifier noise rather than characterizations based solely onaggregate error rates.
Title:Are Verifier Errors Independent Within a GRPO Group? Evidence from Qwen2.5 Rollouts
Abstract:Group-based reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) scoresmultiple completions per prompt using automatic verifiers. Analysesbased on independent verifier errors may overlook dependence associatedwith shared answer formats. We investigate this dependence in24,998 groups of eight completions generated by Qwen2.5-1.5B onMATH, GSM8K, and DeepMath-103K. We estimate a pooled within-groupverifier-error correlation of 0.530 (95% confidence interval:0.500--0.560). Under an exchangeable-error model, this correspondsto a design-effect-adjusted effective sample size of 1.70 for aneight-completion group. Dependence varies substantially across answerforms: fractions, radicals, symbolic expressions, and intervals exhibitstronger clustering than unit annotations and percent signs. Replayinggroup-relative advantages across four rule-based verifier configurationsidentifies at least one advantage-sign disagreement in up to 0.83% ofgroups. Because a group is repeated sampling for one prompt, thiswithin-group clustering may reflect shared prompt difficulty as well asshared answer form, and we do not attempt to separate the two this http URL studies of correlated judgments across multiple evaluators, ouranalysis examines dependence across completions scored by the sameverifier. These findings motivate prompt- and answer-form-aware analysesof verifier noise rather than characterizations based solely onaggregate error rates.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.06386 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.06386v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.06386 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 281 words
Related coverage

When Partial Credit Opposes Completion
Snorkel AI Blog · Oct 15, 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026
Debugging Logprob Mismatches in LLM Reinforcement Learning
AMD · Sep 23, 2026