aiqbench analysis
This study reveals that arithmetic capabilities in LLMs rely on a shared set of neurons across different input formats—symbols, text, and code—rather than distinct circuits. By demonstrating that failures stem from activation states rather than architectural differences, the research provides critical insights into the mechanistic interpretability of mathematical reasoning within large models.
Are Arithmetic Heuristic Neurons Form-Invariant? A Mechanistic Analysis of Symbols, Text, and Code in LLMs
arXiv:2607.16693v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models often succeed on one formulation of a problem while failing on an equivalent formulation. Whether these failures arise from distinct internal circuits or different activation states of a shared circuit remains unknown. Recent mechanistic interpretability studies suggest that arithmetic in LLMs emerges from a "bag of heuristics," encoded by a sparse set of MLP neurons that represent distinct arithmetic strategies. We investigate whether arithmetic heuristic neurons are form-invariant across symbolic arithmetic, natural language word problems, and Python code in three Llama-3 models. In each format, we identify arithmetic heuristic neurons using a two-stage pipeline combining attribution patching and activation patching. A compact set of neurons is shared across all three formats, and targeted interventions show this shared circuit is both necessary and sufficient for late-layer arithmetic computation. Transferring the shared neurons' activations from a successful execution in one format to a failed execution in another recovers most incorrect predictions, exceeding 97% for addition and subtraction, indicating that cross-format failures arise from activation states rather than distinct circuits. Moreover, shared neurons consistently belong to the same heuristic families across formats, demonstrating that arithmetic computation in LLMs is largely form-invariant at the neuron level.
Title:Are Arithmetic Heuristic Neurons Form-Invariant? A Mechanistic Analysis of Symbols, Text, and Code in LLMs
Abstract:Large language models often succeed on one formulation of a problem while failing on an equivalent formulation. Whether these failures arise from distinct internal circuits or different activation states of a shared circuit remains unknown. Recent mechanistic interpretability studies suggest that arithmetic in LLMs emerges from a "bag of heuristics," encoded by a sparse set of MLP neurons that represent distinct arithmetic strategies. We investigate whether arithmetic heuristic neurons are form-invariant across symbolic arithmetic, natural language word problems, and Python code in three Llama-3 models. In each format, we identify arithmetic heuristic neurons using a two-stage pipeline combining attribution patching and activation patching. A compact set of neurons is shared across all three formats, and targeted interventions show this shared circuit is both necessary and sufficient for late-layer arithmetic computation. Transferring the shared neurons' activations from a successful execution in one format to a failed execution in another recovers most incorrect predictions, exceeding 97% for addition and subtraction, indicating that cross-format failures arise from activation states rather than distinct circuits. Moreover, shared neurons consistently belong to the same heuristic families across formats, demonstrating that arithmetic computation in LLMs is largely form-invariant at the neuron level.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2607.16693 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2607.16693v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.16693 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 305 words
Related coverage

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026
A Mike's-Eye View of ARC's Research
AI Alignment Forum · Jun 9, 2026
Performance Profiling on AMD GPUs – Part 5: Profiling-Driven Kernel Optimization with an AI Code-Assist Tool
AMD · Jul 16, 2026