Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

ARCO addresses the interpretability gap in multi-step LLM agents by introducing adaptive, per-step rubrics that co-evolve alongside agent training. This approach provides granular feedback on individual actions rather than just final outcomes, enabling better diagnosis and robustness across complex reasoning tasks like HotpotQA and MuSiQue. The method demonstrates superior performance using open-source backbones while maintaining transparency through natural-language criteria.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

ARCO: Adaptive Rubrics with Co-Evolution for Multi-Step LLM-Based Agents

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2606.21262v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning for multi-step LLM agents often relies on scalar rewards that indicate success but cannot explain why a trajectory is good or bad. Rubric-based rewards improve interpretability through natural-language criteria, but existing methods share two limitations: they score at the trajectory level, offering no guidance for individual steps; and their scorer is closed-source and static, so it cannot adapt as the agent evolves during training. We propose ARCO (Adaptive Rubric CO-evolution), which generates a per-step rubric and predicts a rubric-conditioned step-level reward for each action, and continually updates this rubric model on on-policy rollouts so that its criteria and scores co-evolve with the agent's improving behavior. Across HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, and MuSiQue with two open-source backbones, ARCO achieves the highest EM in all settings over outcome-, rubric-, and process-reward baselines, and analyses show its rubrics are step-specific, robust to design choices, and useful for diagnosing agent behavior. Code and data are available at https://github.com/zihangtian/ARCO.

Abstract:Reinforcement learning for multi-step LLM agents often relies on scalar rewards that indicate success but cannot explain why a trajectory is good or bad. Rubric-based rewards improve interpretability through natural-language criteria, but existing methods share two limitations: they score at the trajectory level, offering no guidance for individual steps; and their scorer is closed-source and static, so it cannot adapt as the agent evolves during training. We propose ARCO (Adaptive Rubric CO-evolution), which generates a per-step rubric and predicts a rubric-conditioned step-level reward for each action, and continually updates this rubric model on on-policy rollouts so that its criteria and scores co-evolve with the agent's improving behavior. Across HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, and MuSiQue with two open-source backbones, ARCO achieves the highest EM in all settings over outcome-, rubric-, and process-reward baselines, and analyses show its rubrics are step-specific, robust to design choices, and useful for diagnosing agent behavior. Code and data are available at this https URL.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2606.21262 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2606.21262v2 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.21262 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 252 words

Related coverage