aiqbench analysis
This research identifies a novel security vulnerability where frontier large language models can learn arbitrary cipher-based covert communication solely through prompting, eliminating the need for fine-tuning to bypass safety filters. By encrypting harmful content into gibberish, these attacks successfully evade standard commercial classifiers and weaken model alignment against Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI systems. The findings highlight a critical shift in jailbreak methodologies that relies on in-context learning rather than parameter updates, posing new risks for AI deployment security.
Arbitrary Cipher Attacks Against Large Language Models Do Not Require Fine-Tuning
arXiv:2609.09553v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model safety and security research is preoccupied with, among other things, detecting and preventing jailbreak attacks: alignment bypasses that allow an adversarial user to elicit unwanted or harmful outputs from models. Arbitrary cipher, or covert communication, attacks are one such type of jailbreak and have previously been demonstrated against the fine-tuning APIs of commercial models. In these attacks, target models are trained on a corpus of encrypted harmful questions and responses and subsequently respond to harmful requests through the learned encryption scheme. In this paper, we show that newer frontier models do not require fine-tuning to acquire cipher-based communication skills. Instead, they can learn these skills through prompting and, when necessary, through in-context learning. Furthermore, model alignment is significantly weakened or entirely bypassed when communication occurs through the learned cipher. To the best of our knowledge, this constitutes a novel attack vector against commercial black-box large language models. We demonstrate successful jailbreaks against frontier models developed by Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI. Our attack bypasses commercial harmfulness classifiers because harmful content is encrypted and therefore appears as nonsensical text or gibberish.
Abstract:Large language model safety and security research is preoccupied with, among other things, detecting and preventing jailbreak attacks: alignment bypasses that allow an adversarial user to elicit unwanted or harmful outputs from models. Arbitrary cipher, or covert communication, attacks are one such type of jailbreak and have previously been demonstrated against the fine-tuning APIs of commercial models. In these attacks, target models are trained on a corpus of encrypted harmful questions and responses and subsequently respond to harmful requests through the learned encryption scheme. In this paper, we show that newer frontier models do not require fine-tuning to acquire cipher-based communication skills. Instead, they can learn these skills through prompting and, when necessary, through in-context learning. Furthermore, model alignment is significantly weakened or entirely bypassed when communication occurs through the learned cipher. To the best of our knowledge, this constitutes a novel attack vector against commercial black-box large language models. We demonstrate successful jailbreaks against frontier models developed by Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI. Our attack bypasses commercial harmfulness classifiers because harmful content is encrypted and therefore appears as nonsensical text or gibberish.
Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.09553 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2609.09553v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.09553 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 280 words
Related coverage

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026
Discovering cryptographic weaknesses with Claude
anthropic.com · Jul 28, 2026
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 23, 2026