aiqbench analysis
Arbiter introduces a novel framework for stress-testing system prompts in LLM-based coding agents by combining formal rules with multi-model evaluation to detect interference patterns and data loss vulnerabilities. The study reveals that prompt architecture significantly influences failure modes and demonstrates the cost-efficiency of cross-vendor analysis in uncovering root causes that single-model checks miss. This work advances the reliability engineering of AI software artifacts, addressing a critical gap in testing infrastructure for autonomous coding agents.
Arbiter: Detecting Interference in LLM Agent System Prompts
arXiv:2603.08993v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: System prompts for LLM-based coding agents are software artifacts that govern agent behavior, yet lack the testing infrastructure applied to conventional software. We present Arbiter, a framework combining formal evaluation rules with multi-model LLM scouring to detect interference patterns in system prompts. Applied to three major coding agent system prompts: Claude Code (Anthropic), Codex CLI (OpenAI), and Gemini CLI (Google), we identify 152 findings across the undirected scouring phase and 21 hand-labeled interference patterns in directed analysis of one vendor. We show that prompt architecture (monolithic, flat, modular) strongly correlates with observed failure class but not with severity, and that multi-model evaluation discovers categorically different vulnerability classes than single-model analysis. One scourer finding was structural data loss in Gemini CLI's memory system was consistent with an issue filed and patched by Google, which addressed the symptom without addressing the schema-level root cause identified by the scourer. Total cost of cross-vendor analysis: \$0.27 USD.
Abstract:System prompts for LLM-based coding agents are software artifacts that govern agent behavior, yet lack the testing infrastructure applied to conventional software. We present Arbiter, a framework combining formal evaluation rules with multi-model LLM scouring to detect interference patterns in system prompts. Applied to three major coding agent system prompts: Claude Code (Anthropic), Codex CLI (OpenAI), and Gemini CLI (Google), we identify 152 findings across the undirected scouring phase and 21 hand-labeled interference patterns in directed analysis of one vendor. We show that prompt architecture (monolithic, flat, modular) strongly correlates with observed failure class but not with severity, and that multi-model evaluation discovers categorically different vulnerability classes than single-model analysis. One scourer finding was structural data loss in Gemini CLI's memory system was consistent with an issue filed and patched by Google, which addressed the symptom without addressing the schema-level root cause identified by the scourer. Total cost of cross-vendor analysis: \$0.27 USD.
Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Programming Languages (cs.PL)
arXiv:2603.08993 [cs.SE]
(or arXiv:2603.08993v2 [cs.SE] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.08993 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 255 words
Related coverage
The Arbiter Agent: Continually Monitoring Multi-Agent Conversations to Detect Emergent Misalignment
arXiv · Jun 10, 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026

MITRE ATT&CK v20 Added 9 New Attack Techniques Covering AI Exploits, MFA Bypass, and CAPTCHA Evasion
Cybersecurity News · Oct 16, 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026