aiqbench analysis
This study evaluates Large Language Models on the challenging task of Arabic morphosyntactic tagging and dependency parsing, highlighting how retrieval-based in-context learning significantly boosts performance over zero-shot prompting. While top-tier LLMs can approach supervised system accuracy, the analysis underscores the heavy computational costs and data requirements needed for effective demonstration retrieval in low-resource language settings.
Arabic Morphosyntactic Tagging and Dependency Parsing with Large Language Models
arXiv:2603.16718v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: LLMs perform strongly across NLP, but their ability to produce explicit grammatical analyses remains unclear. Arabic provides a challenging testbed due to its rich morphology and orthographic ambiguity, which create strong morphology-syntax interactions. We present a unified evaluation of LLMs on Arabic morphosyntactic tagging and dependency parsing, covering pre-tokenized, raw-text, and cascaded settings. We compare zero-shot prompting with retrieval-based in-context learning. Relevant demonstrations substantially improve performance. The strongest LLMs approach supervised tagging and parsing systems; however, they require substantial annotated data for demonstration retrieval and considerable computational resources. We make all code and data used in this paper publicly available.
Abstract:LLMs perform strongly across NLP, but their ability to produce explicit grammatical analyses remains unclear. Arabic provides a challenging testbed due to its rich morphology and orthographic ambiguity, which create strong morphology-syntax interactions. We present a unified evaluation of LLMs on Arabic morphosyntactic tagging and dependency parsing, covering pre-tokenized, raw-text, and cascaded settings. We compare zero-shot prompting with retrieval-based in-context learning. Relevant demonstrations substantially improve performance. The strongest LLMs approach supervised tagging and parsing systems; however, they require substantial annotated data for demonstration retrieval and considerable computational resources. We make all code and data used in this paper publicly available.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2603.16718 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2603.16718v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.16718 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 193 words
Related coverage

Customizing your knowledge base on Amazon Bedrock for large and complex documents using Amazon Textract
AWS · Sep 4, 2026
AfriSUD: A Dependency Treebank Collection for Evaluating Models on African Languages
arXiv · Sep 2, 2026
AfriSUD: A Dependency Treebank Collection for Evaluating Models on African Languages
arXiv · Jun 12, 2026

Presentation: Automating the Web With MCP: Infra That Doesn’t Break
InfoQ · Jun 16, 2026