aiqbench analysis
This research introduces AQKA, a novel framework for active quantum kernel acquisition that optimizes measurement shot allocation based on entry-specific contribution rather than uniform distribution. By providing closed-form theories and demonstrating significant performance gains on IBM hardware like the Heron processor, it addresses a critical bottleneck in deploying quantum kernels with limited resources.
AQKA: Active Quantum Kernel Acquisition Under a Shot Budget
arXiv:2605.14672v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Estimating an $N \times N$ quantum kernel from circuit fidelities requires $\Theta(N^2 S)$ measurement shots, the dominant bottleneck for deployment on near-term hardware. Existing budget-saving methods (Nystr\"om-QKE, ShoFaR, kernel-target alignment) sub-sample \emph{which} entries to measure but allocate shots \emph{uniformly} within their chosen subset, ignoring how much each entry drives the downstream classifier. We close this gap with two contributions. \textbf{First, a complete regime decomposition} for shot-budgeted quantum kernel learning: a principled menu of when each allocator wins. Our method, \emph{AQKA}, dominates the budget-limited regime ($B \lesssim 16 n_{\mathrm{pairs}}$) on sparse-sensitivity KRR, with the gap \emph{growing} from $+8$ to $+25$ pts over uniform as $N$ scales $225{\to}1000$ and reaching $+26$--$32$ pts on an \texttt{ibm\_pittsburgh} (156-qubit Heron) hardware kernel; Nystr\"om-QKE wins at saturating budgets on planted-sparse via low-rank reconstruction; ShoFaR is competitive only at extreme low budgets. \textbf{Second, a closed-form pair-level acquisition theory}: $s_{ij}^{\star} \propto |g_{ij}|\sqrt{K_{ij}(1-K_{ij})}$ with explicit gradient $g_{ij}$ for KRR (Lemma~1, $|\beta_i\alpha_j+\beta_j\alpha_i|\sqrt{K_{ij}(1-K_{ij})}$) and SVM via the envelope theorem ($|\eta_i^*\eta_j^*|\sqrt{K_{ij}(1-K_{ij})}$); a \emph{corrected} sparsity-aware Cauchy--Schwarz rate $\rho \le 2m/N$ matching empirics (vs.\ the naive $m^2/N^2$); an explicit-constant plug-in regret bound (Theorem~2); and a tighter SVM ceiling $\rho^{\mathrm{SVM}} \le m_{\mathrm{sv}}^2/N^2$. We close with the first multi-seed live online adaptive shot allocation on quantum hardware: $+17.0 \pm 4.8$ pts at $N{=}20$ on \texttt{ibm\_aachen} ($3.5\sigma$, 5 seeds), with the advantage holding at $N{=}30$ at higher budget on \texttt{ibm\_berlin} ($+14.0 \pm 8.5$ pts, 5 seeds).
Abstract:Estimating an $N \times N$ quantum kernel from circuit fidelities requires $\Theta(N^2 S)$ measurement shots, the dominant bottleneck for deployment on near-term hardware. Existing budget-saving methods (Nyström-QKE, ShoFaR, kernel-target alignment) sub-sample \emph{which} entries to measure but allocate shots \emph{uniformly} within their chosen subset, ignoring how much each entry drives the downstream classifier. We close this gap with two contributions. \textbf{First, a complete regime decomposition} for shot-budgeted quantum kernel learning: a principled menu of when each allocator wins. Our method, \emph{AQKA}, dominates the budget-limited regime ($B \lesssim 16 n_{\mathrm{pairs}}$) on sparse-sensitivity KRR, with the gap \emph{growing} from $+8$ to $+25$ pts over uniform as $N$ scales $225{\to}1000$ and reaching $+26$--$32$ pts on an \texttt{ibm\_pittsburgh} (156-qubit Heron) hardware kernel; Nyström-QKE wins at saturating budgets on planted-sparse via low-rank reconstruction; ShoFaR is competitive only at extreme low budgets. \textbf{Second, a closed-form pair-level acquisition theory}: $s_{ij}^{\star} \propto |g_{ij}|\sqrt{K_{ij}(1-K_{ij})}$ with explicit gradient $g_{ij}$ for KRR (Lemma~1, $|\beta_i\alpha_j+\beta_j\alpha_i|\sqrt{K_{ij}(1-K_{ij})}$) and SVM via the envelope theorem ($|\eta_i^*\eta_j^*|\sqrt{K_{ij}(1-K_{ij})}$); a \emph{corrected} sparsity-aware Cauchy--Schwarz rate $\rho \le 2m/N$ matching empirics (vs.\ the naive $m^2/N^2$); an explicit-constant plug-in regret bound (Theorem~2); and a tighter SVM ceiling $\rho^{\mathrm{SVM}} \le m_{\mathrm{sv}}^2/N^2$. We close with the first multi-seed live online adaptive shot allocation on quantum hardware: $+17.0 \pm 4.8$ pts at $N{=}20$ on \texttt{ibm\_aachen} ($3.5\sigma$, 5 seeds), with the advantage holding at $N{=}30$ at higher budget on \texttt{ibm\_berlin} ($+14.0 \pm 8.5$ pts, 5 seeds).
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2605.14672 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2605.14672v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.14672 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 321 words
