aiqbench analysis
APTInvestBench introduces a critical benchmark for evaluating the robustness of LLM agents in autonomous Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) investigations across varying telemetry environments. The study reveals significant instability where aggregate coverage metrics mask substantial drops in citation support when log collection shifts from full to endpoint-only, highlighting a key reliability gap in current security AI tools. This research is essential for understanding how well AI-driven SOC operations can maintain performance under real-world data constraints.
APTInvestBench: Evaluating Autonomous APT Investigation under Varying Telemetry
arXiv:2609.38954v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents could help security operations centers (SOCs) investigate advanced persistent threats (APTs) by turning weak leads into evidence for intrusion scoping and response. Yet success under one telemetry setting does not establish robustness to changes in log collection, retention, or sampling. We introduce APTInvestBench, a benchmark for evaluating cross-telemetry robustness in autonomous APT investigation. It comprises 370 cases across seven SOC-inspired conditions, derived from 56 report-informed attack reconstructions with 16.4 million log records. Agents investigate unverified leads and submit reports with record-level citations. Fixed action-level support requirements track sufficient evidence across available logs, query returns, and formal citations, separating telemetry limitations from acquisition and reporting gaps. Across eleven LLMs, agents acquire sufficient evidence for 44.3% of recoverable attack actions on average, while formal citations support only 25.0%. More importantly, aggregate coverage can conceal substantial instability: from Full to endpoint-only telemetry, coverage declines by only 1.6 percentage points, yet 35.5% of previously covered actions lose sufficient citation support despite remaining recoverable. Across four frameworks, such losses persist even when registered supporting records remain unchanged. APTInvestBench provides reusable investigation environments and diagnostic evaluation for identifying these gaps and developing more reliable defensive agents.
Abstract:Large language model (LLM) agents could help security operations centers (SOCs) investigate advanced persistent threats (APTs) by turning weak leads into evidence for intrusion scoping and response. Yet success under one telemetry setting does not establish robustness to changes in log collection, retention, or sampling. We introduce APTInvestBench, a benchmark for evaluating cross-telemetry robustness in autonomous APT investigation. It comprises 370 cases across seven SOC-inspired conditions, derived from 56 report-informed attack reconstructions with 16.4 million log records. Agents investigate unverified leads and submit reports with record-level citations. Fixed action-level support requirements track sufficient evidence across available logs, query returns, and formal citations, separating telemetry limitations from acquisition and reporting gaps. Across eleven LLMs, agents acquire sufficient evidence for 44.3% of recoverable attack actions on average, while formal citations support only 25.0%. More importantly, aggregate coverage can conceal substantial instability: from Full to endpoint-only telemetry, coverage declines by only 1.6 percentage points, yet 35.5% of previously covered actions lose sufficient citation support despite remaining recoverable. Across four frameworks, such losses persist even when registered supporting records remain unchanged. APTInvestBench provides reusable investigation environments and diagnostic evaluation for identifying these gaps and developing more reliable defensive agents.
Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.38954 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2609.38954v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38954 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 293 words
Related coverage

Top 10 Best Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR) Solutions in 2026
Cybersecurity News · Sep 7, 2026

Brief independent investigation of agents’ behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident
METR · Aug 26, 2026

Top 10 Best Antivirus (Endpoint Protection) Software for Business in 2026
Cybersecurity News · Sep 7, 2026

Top 10 Best Managed Detection & Response (MDR) Services in 2026
Cybersecurity News · Sep 8, 2026