Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses a critical gap in stochastic control by introducing distributionally robust constraints based on Kullback-Leibler divergence to handle nonlinear system uncertainties. By bounding the rate of change between true and Gaussian surrogate distributions, the method ensures reliable risk-sensitive performance for complex maneuvers like spacecraft transfers without relying solely on linear approximations.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong, The Quantum Insider, Quantum Zeitgeist
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Approximate Relative Entropy Constraints for Nonlinear Covariance Steering Under Distribution Ambiguity

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2607.16914v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Covariance steering provides an efficient framework for designing linear stochastic feedback policies, but its extension to nonlinear systems relies on a Gaussian surrogate obtained through local linearization. Because this surrogate may differ substantially from the true nonlinear state distribution, risk-sensitive quantities such as collision probability and mean-squared error may be inaccurately estimated. This work develops a distributionally robust covariance-steering framework based on the relative entropy, also known as the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD), to account for ambiguity in the propagated probability density function. Using a variational representation of exponential integrals, we derive computable upper bounds on risk-sensitive quantities over a KLD ambiguity set. We then formulate an upper bound on the time rate of change of the KLD between the true nonlinear distribution and a Gaussian reference surrogate. Under some assumptions, this bound is controlled by decision variables within a covariance-steering formulation. The resulting constraints are incorporated into a sequential convex programming algorithm to design stochastic guidance policies that keep the true distribution close to its Gaussian surrogate while enforcing bounds on risk-sensitive performance measures. The proposed approach is demonstrated on a challenging nonlinear spacecraft transfer between two near-rectilinear halo orbits.

Abstract:Covariance steering provides an efficient framework for designing linear stochastic feedback policies, but its extension to nonlinear systems relies on a Gaussian surrogate obtained through local linearization. Because this surrogate may differ substantially from the true nonlinear state distribution, risk-sensitive quantities such as collision probability and mean-squared error may be inaccurately estimated. This work develops a distributionally robust covariance-steering framework based on the relative entropy, also known as the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD), to account for ambiguity in the propagated probability density function. Using a variational representation of exponential integrals, we derive computable upper bounds on risk-sensitive quantities over a KLD ambiguity set. We then formulate an upper bound on the time rate of change of the KLD between the true nonlinear distribution and a Gaussian reference surrogate. Under some assumptions, this bound is controlled by decision variables within a covariance-steering formulation. The resulting constraints are incorporated into a sequential convex programming algorithm to design stochastic guidance policies that keep the true distribution close to its Gaussian surrogate while enforcing bounds on risk-sensitive performance measures. The proposed approach is demonstrated on a challenging nonlinear spacecraft transfer between two near-rectilinear halo orbits.

Robotics (cs.RO); Information Theory (cs.IT); Systems and Control (eess.SY); Applications (stat.AP)

arXiv:2607.16914 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2607.16914v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.16914 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 292 words

Related coverage