aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces BB-EDGE, a rigorous statistical framework designed to ensure anytime-valid error control in dynamic LLM leaderboards by modeling performance comparisons as a directed graph. By factorizing evidence across benchmark blocks and applying direct e-Holm procedures, the method certifies pairwise model advantages without inflating false discovery rates during repeated updates. The approach offers a necessary theoretical safeguard for evaluating large language models where evaluation outcomes vary significantly across runs.
Anytime-Valid LLM Leaderboards via Benchmark-weighted and Block-Factorized e-Processes
arXiv:2609.32248v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) leaderboards compare model capabilities by ranking models according to their mean performance on fixed benchmarks. However, variability in evaluation outcomes across runs may produce unsupported claims of model superiority on the benchmark, a risk compounded by leaderboard updates. In this paper, we propose BB-EDGE (Benchmark-Weighted and Block-Factorized e-processes for Directed Graph Evaluation), a principled framework that represents an LLM leaderboard as a directed graph whose edges certify pairwise mean-performance advantages, with anytime-valid family-wise error rate (FWER) control. Concretely, for each direction, BB-EDGE constructs an empirical-Bernstein e-process by factorizing evidence over protocol-defined blocks and assigning stakes proportional to the corresponding block weights, then applies direct e-Holm across these $e$-processes to certify directional advantages as edges. Theoretically, we characterize weight-proportional linear stakes under heterogeneous benchmark-average nulls and prove anytime FWER control under arbitrary within-block and cross-pair dependence. BB-EDGE further supports anytime-valid Top-$k$ certification and simultaneous rank intervals. Extensive experiments on synthetic data and four real-world benchmarks demonstrate that BB-EDGE maintains anytime FWER control while achieving high efficiency.
Abstract:Large language model (LLM) leaderboards compare model capabilities by ranking models according to their mean performance on fixed benchmarks. However, variability in evaluation outcomes across runs may produce unsupported claims of model superiority on the benchmark, a risk compounded by leaderboard updates. In this paper, we propose BB-EDGE (Benchmark-Weighted and Block-Factorized e-processes for Directed Graph Evaluation), a principled framework that represents an LLM leaderboard as a directed graph whose edges certify pairwise mean-performance advantages, with anytime-valid family-wise error rate (FWER) control. Concretely, for each direction, BB-EDGE constructs an empirical-Bernstein e-process by factorizing evidence over protocol-defined blocks and assigning stakes proportional to the corresponding block weights, then applies direct e-Holm across these $e$-processes to certify directional advantages as edges. Theoretically, we characterize weight-proportional linear stakes under heterogeneous benchmark-average nulls and prove anytime FWER control under arbitrary within-block and cross-pair dependence. BB-EDGE further supports anytime-valid Top-$k$ certification and simultaneous rank intervals. Extensive experiments on synthetic data and four real-world benchmarks demonstrate that BB-EDGE maintains anytime FWER control while achieving high efficiency.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.32248 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.32248v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32248 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 263 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Agents disprove Polysemanticity; greatly improve Interpretability & Alignment
Latent Space · Oct 16, 2026

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · Jul 21, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026
Top Silicon Spin Quantum Computing Companies 2026: Complete Vendor Guide
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jun 9, 2026