aiqbench analysis
AnyBottle introduces a novel recipe for constructing compact, task-specific concept bottleneck models without requiring manual annotations. By leveraging a black-box teacher to dynamically select concepts based on prediction failures, the method achieves higher interpretability and efficiency compared to static, large-vocabulary baselines. This approach demonstrates that annotation-free models can maintain expressiveness while significantly reducing inference complexity across diverse vision and text tasks.
AnyBottle: A Recipe to Only Keep the Concepts You Really Need
arXiv:2610.08552v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Concept bottleneck models (CBMs) make predictions inspectable and intervenable by routing them through human-interpretable concepts, but originally required concept annotations. Annotation-free variants remove this requirement, but typically use large concept vocabularies, static at both training and inference, producing bottlenecks larger than any task or prediction needs and harder to inspect. We propose AnyBottle, a single recipe for building compact, task-specific CBMs. AnyBottle assumes only a frozen backbone and an unsupervised concept pool, such as a sparse autoencoder. A black-box teacher trained on the same backbone then guides selection: each round adds the concept that best explains the bottleneck's current failures, with candidates restricted to regions of teacher/student disagreement. Trained with nested dropout over this selection order, the final bottleneck predicts accurately from any concept prefix, so inference spends fewer concepts on inputs it is confident about early and more on hard ones. Since no stage is modality-specific, a new domain and task requires swapping only the backbone and concept pool. Across six vision and two text datasets and two teacher paradigms, AnyBottle yields bottlenecks with fewer concepts and higher concept consistency than annotation-free baselines, while staying close to the black-box reference. Overall, AnyBottle shows that going annotation-free need not mean going large: a small, discovered vocabulary can be as expressive as a much larger, fixed one.
Abstract:Concept bottleneck models (CBMs) make predictions inspectable and intervenable by routing them through human-interpretable concepts, but originally required concept annotations. Annotation-free variants remove this requirement, but typically use large concept vocabularies, static at both training and inference, producing bottlenecks larger than any task or prediction needs and harder to inspect. We propose AnyBottle, a single recipe for building compact, task-specific CBMs. AnyBottle assumes only a frozen backbone and an unsupervised concept pool, such as a sparse autoencoder. A black-box teacher trained on the same backbone then guides selection: each round adds the concept that best explains the bottleneck's current failures, with candidates restricted to regions of teacher/student disagreement. Trained with nested dropout over this selection order, the final bottleneck predicts accurately from any concept prefix, so inference spends fewer concepts on inputs it is confident about early and more on hard ones. Since no stage is modality-specific, a new domain and task requires swapping only the backbone and concept pool. Across six vision and two text datasets and two teacher paradigms, AnyBottle yields bottlenecks with fewer concepts and higher concept consistency than annotation-free baselines, while staying close to the black-box reference. Overall, AnyBottle shows that going annotation-free need not mean going large: a small, discovered vocabulary can be as expressive as a much larger, fixed one.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.08552 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.08552v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.08552 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 313 words
Related coverage
Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026
On Slop
LessWrong · Jun 9, 2026
Debating RSI, the US-China Gap, and Jaggedness with JS Denain of Epoch AI
Interconnects · Sep 22, 2026

Presentation: Engineering AI for Creativity and Curiosity on Mobile
InfoQ · Jul 21, 2026