Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses a fundamental challenge in robotics by enabling reliable hidden-target seeking without global localization or direct sensing of the target, relying instead on certified self-calibration from limited relay observations. The method introduces an exact uncertainty certificate that accounts for correlations in odometry drift, significantly improving coverage rates and maintaining high success rates even when communication degrades or frames shift. By proving that absolute pose is unnecessary for task execution, this work advances robust autonomous navigation under severe sensing constraints.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Anchor-Free Hidden-Target Seeking via Certified Self-Calibration under Correlated Odometry

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.27905v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study hidden-target seeking in an anchor-free regime where neither the vehicle, the relay, nor the target has an accessible global pose. The vehicle never senses the target directly; it receives only range-bearing observations through a single relay of unknown position and orientation, with motion known only via integrated body-frame odometry. Absolute localization is fundamentally impossible: the joint configuration retains an exact three-dimensional SE(2) gauge no estimator can resolve. Yet the quantities needed for control remain fully recoverable: motion collapses calibration to a task-relevant quotient, the relay-to-odometry yaw and target displacement, identifiable in closed form from two distinct vehicle views. We introduce an O(K) multi-view self-calibration estimator with an exact first-order yaw-uncertainty certificate that propagates the cross-view correlations integrated odometry induces: the full certificate attains 95.0% pooled coverage at the nominal 95% level, versus 82.1% when correlated poses are treated as independent. The certificate drives a hybrid policy that excites until calibration is trustworthy, refuses uncertified estimates, seeks using continuously re-measured geometry, and detects relay-frame changes via persistent certified inconsistency, avoiding unbounded dead-reckoning drift. Across 200 randomized closed-loop trials, the method attains 0.064 m median station error versus 0.065 m for an oracle given the true relay yaw, despite 27 m median dead-reckoning drift over long horizons; 90 physics-based ROS 2/Gazebo trials retain 30/30 success under nominal operation, communication degradation, and relay-frame disturbances. These results show global localization is unnecessary for reliable hidden-target seeking under this single-relay model, even when both the sensing infrastructure and the vehicle's own reference frame are uncalibrated.

Abstract:We study hidden-target seeking in an anchor-free regime where neither the vehicle, the relay, nor the target has an accessible global pose. The vehicle never senses the target directly; it receives only range-bearing observations through a single relay of unknown position and orientation, with motion known only via integrated body-frame odometry. Absolute localization is fundamentally impossible: the joint configuration retains an exact three-dimensional SE(2) gauge no estimator can resolve. Yet the quantities needed for control remain fully recoverable: motion collapses calibration to a task-relevant quotient, the relay-to-odometry yaw and target displacement, identifiable in closed form from two distinct vehicle views. We introduce an O(K) multi-view self-calibration estimator with an exact first-order yaw-uncertainty certificate that propagates the cross-view correlations integrated odometry induces: the full certificate attains 95.0% pooled coverage at the nominal 95% level, versus 82.1% when correlated poses are treated as independent. The certificate drives a hybrid policy that excites until calibration is trustworthy, refuses uncertified estimates, seeks using continuously re-measured geometry, and detects relay-frame changes via persistent certified inconsistency, avoiding unbounded dead-reckoning drift. Across 200 randomized closed-loop trials, the method attains 0.064 m median station error versus 0.065 m for an oracle given the true relay yaw, despite 27 m median dead-reckoning drift over long horizons; 90 physics-based ROS 2/Gazebo trials retain 30/30 success under nominal operation, communication degradation, and relay-frame disturbances. These results show global localization is unnecessary for reliable hidden-target seeking under this single-relay model, even when both the sensing infrastructure and the vehicle's own reference frame are uncalibrated.

Robotics (cs.RO); Systems and Control (eess.SY)

arXiv:2609.27905 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.27905v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27905 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 349 words

Related coverage