aiqbench analysis
This paper is squarely about machine learning: a rule-based curriculum for training reinforcement learning agents (PPO with a GTrXL architecture) on the Craftax-Full benchmark. It is a research result on training methodology, not a product or policy story. For AI readers, the notable claim is that an explicit, non-LLM curriculum can match returns reported for LLM-generated curricula, though the gains are modest, the comparison relies on reported figures from other papers, and the deepest achievements remain unsolved.
Anchor-and-Harvest Curriculum: A Fully Unmasked Non-LLM Curriculum for Craftax
arXiv:2610.15328v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce Anchor-and-Harvest Curriculum (AHC), a domain-informed, rule-based training system for Craftax-Full. AHC combines achievement-oriented tasks, harvested initial-state progress, difficulty adaptation, bounded selection, and original-task practice. It uses no LLM inference and keeps all 43 actions available. At 2,005,401,600 PPO rollout transitions, three primary AHC runs obtain native-task return $46.70\pm0.57$ (sample SD), compared with $41.91\pm1.01$ for fresh native PPO-GTrXL with the same student architecture and evaluation protocol. Evaluation uses ten stochastic rollouts on each of 1024 fixed worlds per model. An additional cohort of three AHC runs reaches $46.08\pm1.23$. Two single-component ablations retain similar mean returns, while jointly freezing difficulty and removing inherited progress gives $45.14\pm2.79$. All-67-achievement profiles show that most of the return difference comes from Intermediate achievements, while the deepest-floor achievements remain unsolved. A Skill-Preflight diagnosis with a 14B teacher shows how prerequisite and floor-access constraints restrict practice. AHC and three 14B diagnostic configurations reach aggregate returns near the reported 80B DiCode mean of 45.88 and below the 235B mean of 48.55. These results show that an explicit curriculum without LLM inference can reach returns comparable to those reported for LLM-generated curricula on Craftax-Full, without action masking.
Abstract:We introduce Anchor-and-Harvest Curriculum (AHC), a domain-informed, rule-based training system for Craftax-Full. AHC combines achievement-oriented tasks, harvested initial-state progress, difficulty adaptation, bounded selection, and original-task practice. It uses no LLM inference and keeps all 43 actions available. At 2,005,401,600 PPO rollout transitions, three primary AHC runs obtain native-task return $46.70\pm0.57$ (sample SD), compared with $41.91\pm1.01$ for fresh native PPO-GTrXL with the same student architecture and evaluation protocol. Evaluation uses ten stochastic rollouts on each of 1024 fixed worlds per model. An additional cohort of three AHC runs reaches $46.08\pm1.23$. Two single-component ablations retain similar mean returns, while jointly freezing difficulty and removing inherited progress gives $45.14\pm2.79$. All-67-achievement profiles show that most of the return difference comes from Intermediate achievements, while the deepest-floor achievements remain unsolved. A Skill-Preflight diagnosis with a 14B teacher shows how prerequisite and floor-access constraints restrict practice. AHC and three 14B diagnostic configurations reach aggregate returns near the reported 80B DiCode mean of 45.88 and below the 235B mean of 48.55. These results show that an explicit curriculum without LLM inference can reach returns comparable to those reported for LLM-generated curricula on Craftax-Full, without action masking.
37 pages, 7 figures. All authors contributed equally as first authors
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.15328 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.15328v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.15328 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 297 words
Related coverage

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026
Models Can't Remember Their Training. Neither Can You.
LessWrong · Jul 19, 2026
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

Enterprise Quantum Cybersecurity, a Practical Guide for 2026
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 14, 2026