aiqbench analysis
This research presents a novel pulse-shaping technique using a single control field to suppress leakage errors in fast two-qubit gates, addressing a critical bottleneck in superconducting quantum architectures that typically rely on multiple channels. By leveraging a Magnus expansion, the method achieves up to three orders of magnitude reduction in non-adiabatic leakage for iSWAP gates without breaking time-reversal symmetry, offering a practical path toward more efficient quantum control protocols.
Analytic leakage suppression with a single control field: fast two-qubit gates with tunable couplers
arXiv:2609.20766v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Simple analytic pulse-shaping techniques are of great practical utility in quantum control, with prime examples being the DRAG method for suppressing leakage in superconducting microwave gates and the transitionless-driving approach to shortcuts-to-adiabaticity. Standard versions of these methods require two orthogonal control channels, with the second channel effectively breaking time-reversal symmetry. This appears to rule out their use in settings with only a single real-valued control field, such as the kind of baseband flux control that is common in many superconducting circuit architectures. We show here that a simple analytic pulse-shaping technique derived via a Magnus expansion is effective even with just a single baseband control channel. We demonstrate its efficacy by simulating a two-qubit gate between transmons realized with a tunable coupler and baseband flux pulses. Our corrections dramatically reduce non-adiabatic leakage caused by ramping the coupler: for realistic device parameters, leakage in a fast iSWAP gate is suppressed by up to three orders of magnitude. Our approach is general, goes beyond simply suppressing unwanted spectral weight at leakage transitions, and can be applied to a variety of platforms.
Abstract:Simple analytic pulse-shaping techniques are of great practical utility in quantum control, with prime examples being the DRAG method for suppressing leakage in superconducting microwave gates and the transitionless-driving approach to shortcuts-to-adiabaticity. Standard versions of these methods require two orthogonal control channels, with the second channel effectively breaking time-reversal symmetry. This appears to rule out their use in settings with only a single real-valued control field, such as the kind of baseband flux control that is common in many superconducting circuit architectures. We show here that a simple analytic pulse-shaping technique derived via a Magnus expansion is effective even with just a single baseband control channel. We demonstrate its efficacy by simulating a two-qubit gate between transmons realized with a tunable coupler and baseband flux pulses. Our corrections dramatically reduce non-adiabatic leakage caused by ramping the coupler: for realistic device parameters, leakage in a fast iSWAP gate is suppressed by up to three orders of magnitude. Our approach is general, goes beyond simply suppressing unwanted spectral weight at leakage transitions, and can be applied to a variety of platforms.
arXiv:2609.20766 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.20766v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.20766 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 270 words
Related coverage

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026

New control method cuts errors in Rydberg qubit entanglement
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 1, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026