aiqbench analysis
This research proposes using physiological markers derived from human speech production—such as respiration and phonation patterns—to detect deepfake audio, addressing the limitations of current artifact-based detectors. By analyzing these specific biological signals, the study demonstrates an interpretable approach that maintains performance even when facing unseen attack conditions or recording environments. The findings suggest that leveraging inherent human vocal mechanics offers a robust pathway for securing voice authentication systems against generative adversarial threats.
An Initial Study of Physiological Markers for Deepfake Speech Detection
arXiv:2610.18934v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Conventional deepfake speech detectors primarily target synthesis artifacts and often degrade under unseen attacks or recording conditions. Human speech, however, contains physiological markers associated with respiration, phonation, and temporal coordination arising from the speech-production system that synthesizers may not reproduce faithfully. This motivates the hypothesis that deepfake speech can be detected by identifying inconsistencies in these patterns, which we test using 36 handcrafted physiological markers organized into respiratory, vocal, and temporal categories. We evaluate the marker vectors with logistic regression and SVM classifiers on pooled English recordings. The best in-domain system achieves a 21.40% equal error rate (EER), while logistic regression achieves 32.77% on the out-of-domain dataset pair. Since the markers describe specific speech-production properties, the logistic-regression coefficients indicate whether higher marker values push the classifier toward bona fide or deepfake speech. These results provide initial evidence that physiological markers offer a useful, interpretable signal for deepfake speech detection.
Abstract:Conventional deepfake speech detectors primarily target synthesis artifacts and often degrade under unseen attacks or recording conditions. Human speech, however, contains physiological markers associated with respiration, phonation, and temporal coordination arising from the speech-production system that synthesizers may not reproduce faithfully. This motivates the hypothesis that deepfake speech can be detected by identifying inconsistencies in these patterns, which we test using 36 handcrafted physiological markers organized into respiratory, vocal, and temporal categories. We evaluate the marker vectors with logistic regression and SVM classifiers on pooled English recordings. The best in-domain system achieves a 21.40% equal error rate (EER), while logistic regression achieves 32.77% on the out-of-domain dataset pair. Since the markers describe specific speech-production properties, the logistic-regression coefficients indicate whether higher marker values push the classifier toward bona fide or deepfake speech. These results provide initial evidence that physiological markers offer a useful, interpretable signal for deepfake speech detection.
Sound (cs.SD); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.18934 [cs.SD]
(or arXiv:2610.18934v1 [cs.SD] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.18934 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 253 words
Related coverage

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 6, 2026

I Did This Without Your Knowledge
LessWrong · Oct 17, 2026
Trajectory Dynamics in Self-Supervised Learning Latent Space for Audio Deepfake Detection
arXiv · Aug 17, 2026