aiqbench analysis
This research identifies a previously overlooked "informational curse of horizon" in goal-conditioned policy learning, demonstrating that extending goal relabeling horizons degrades generalization by reducing the mutual information between actions and relabeled goals. The authors show that while reinforcement learning mitigates this issue compared to behavioral cloning, distilling short-horizon Jacobians into long-horizon policies offers a practical solution for improving performance in combinatorial manipulation tasks.
An Informational Curse of Horizon in Goal-Conditioned Policy Learning
arXiv:2610.09247v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The difficulty of learning goal-reaching policies is often attributed to a "curse of horizon" that manifests as bias accumulation in temporal-difference backups and noisy advantage estimates. In this work, we identify an additional informational curse of horizon in goal-conditioned policy learning, where increasing the goal relabeling horizon can significantly reduce policy generalization and performance. Through a series of controlled experiments with oracle planners, we decouple the goal horizons sampled during training from those that the policy is asked to reach at test time. Even when evaluated only on a sequence of nearby subgoals, goal-conditioned behavioral cloning (BC) policies suffer from severe, training horizon-dependent performance degradation that is mitigated by reinforcement learning (RL) objectives. We explain this phenomenon as a horizon-dependent decrease in the conditional mutual information between actions and hindsight-relabeled goals, and find empirically that both BC and RL policies trained on longer-horizon goals exhibit a shift in sensitivity from goal to state information, as measured by the policy's input Jacobians. Motivated by this observation, we find that distilling the input Jacobians of short-horizon policies into long-horizon policies yields significant performance gains, especially in combinatorial manipulation tasks. Taken together, our results highlight goal relabeling horizon as an important consideration when learning generalist policies from offline data.
Abstract:The difficulty of learning goal-reaching policies is often attributed to a "curse of horizon" that manifests as bias accumulation in temporal-difference backups and noisy advantage estimates. In this work, we identify an additional informational curse of horizon in goal-conditioned policy learning, where increasing the goal relabeling horizon can significantly reduce policy generalization and performance. Through a series of controlled experiments with oracle planners, we decouple the goal horizons sampled during training from those that the policy is asked to reach at test time. Even when evaluated only on a sequence of nearby subgoals, goal-conditioned behavioral cloning (BC) policies suffer from severe, training horizon-dependent performance degradation that is mitigated by reinforcement learning (RL) objectives. We explain this phenomenon as a horizon-dependent decrease in the conditional mutual information between actions and hindsight-relabeled goals, and find empirically that both BC and RL policies trained on longer-horizon goals exhibit a shift in sensitivity from goal to state information, as measured by the policy's input Jacobians. Motivated by this observation, we find that distilling the input Jacobians of short-horizon policies into long-horizon policies yields significant performance gains, especially in combinatorial manipulation tasks. Taken together, our results highlight goal relabeling horizon as an important consideration when learning generalist policies from offline data.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2610.09247 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.09247v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.09247 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 305 words
Related coverage

The Alignment Problem: Computer Science Meets Analytic Philosophy
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 18, 2026

Benchtalks #3: We taught AI everything except how to learn
Snorkel AI Blog · Jun 25, 2026
Improving Offline Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning via Selective Reward Stimulation
arXiv · Sep 18, 2026
Action-Sufficient Goal Representations
arXiv · Jul 28, 2026