Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes a fundamental theoretical advantage for quantum inference protocols that preserve coherence, demonstrating exponentially lower sample complexity compared to standard measurement-based approaches. By proving separations in tasks like quantum purity amplification and approximate cloning, the study defines new efficiency limits for processing quantum data without collapsing it into classical outputs. These findings are critical for advancing practical quantum algorithms that require maintaining quantum states throughout the inference process.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

An Exponential Sample-Complexity Advantage for Coherent Quantum Inference

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2605.21457v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Standard quantum inference converts quantum data into classical outputs. We study an alternative inference setting in which the desired output is quantum. Such settings include quantum purity amplification (QPA), random purification and approximate cloning, and density matrix exponentiation. We show that such protocols can achieve exponentially lower sample complexity than incoherent, measurement-mediated protocols, establishing, to the best of our knowledge, the first nontrivial separations between dimension-independent coherent and dimension-dependent incoherent sample complexity. For QPA with principal-eigenstate targets and $d$-dimensional inputs, at fixed output number and spectral gap, coherent processing achieves error $\varepsilon$ using $O(1/\varepsilon)$ copies, whereas any incoherent protocol requires $\Omega(d/\varepsilon)$ copies. Together, these separations motivate a unified picture of coherent quantum inference, in which an entanglement-breaking limit identifies the optimal incoherent counterpart.

Abstract:Standard quantum inference converts quantum data into classical outputs. We study an alternative inference setting in which the desired output is quantum. Such settings include quantum purity amplification (QPA), random purification and approximate cloning, and density matrix exponentiation. We show that such protocols can achieve exponentially lower sample complexity than incoherent, measurement-mediated protocols, establishing, to the best of our knowledge, the first nontrivial separations between dimension-independent coherent and dimension-dependent incoherent sample complexity. For QPA with principal-eigenstate targets and $d$-dimensional inputs, at fixed output number and spectral gap, coherent processing achieves error $\varepsilon$ using $O(1/\varepsilon)$ copies, whereas any incoherent protocol requires $\Omega(d/\varepsilon)$ copies. Together, these separations motivate a unified picture of coherent quantum inference, in which an entanglement-breaking limit identifies the optimal incoherent counterpart.

arXiv:2605.21457 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2605.21457v2 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.21457 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 212 words

Related coverage