aiqbench analysis
This research addresses the critical need for explainability in AI-driven educational tools by combining large language models with instructor-verified pedagogical knowledge to ensure reliable feedback. The proposed framework successfully maps student coding errors to specific misconceptions, offering a scalable solution that maintains high accuracy while fostering positive learning experiences in introductory programming courses. By grounding reliability in human-defined expertise rather than black-box outputs, this approach sets a new standard for trustworthy AI integration in computer science education.
An Explainable AI Assistant for Introductory Programming Education: Improving Feedback Reliability with Instructor-AI Collaboration
arXiv:2606.12425v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Active learning is widely recognized as an effective approach for improving learning outcomes in introductory programming courses. However, insufficient instructional support often limits students' access to timely, personalized feedback, which is crucial for mastering foundational programming concepts. Although recent advances in AI, particularly large language models, offer scalable opportunities for feedback, concerns about explainability and reliability remain. In this paper, we present an AI-driven classroom assistant that leverages an explainable AI model to analyze student code, map logical errors to instructor-identified misconceptions, and deliver instructor-authored feedback, thereby grounding reliability in instructor-defined pedagogical knowledge. To evaluate the effectiveness of our framework, we conducted an expert evaluation to examine its alignment with instructor-verified feedback and deployed the system in a classroom setting to assess students' perceptions of its usability. Results indicate that the assistant can provide accurate, instructor-verified feedback to students while fostering a positive experience.
Abstract:Active learning is widely recognized as an effective approach for improving learning outcomes in introductory programming courses. However, insufficient instructional support often limits students' access to timely, personalized feedback, which is crucial for mastering foundational programming concepts. Although recent advances in AI, particularly large language models, offer scalable opportunities for feedback, concerns about explainability and reliability remain. In this paper, we present an AI-driven classroom assistant that leverages an explainable AI model to analyze student code, map logical errors to instructor-identified misconceptions, and deliver instructor-authored feedback, thereby grounding reliability in instructor-defined pedagogical knowledge. To evaluate the effectiveness of our framework, we conducted an expert evaluation to examine its alignment with instructor-verified feedback and deployed the system in a classroom setting to assess students' perceptions of its usability. Results indicate that the assistant can provide accurate, instructor-verified feedback to students while fostering a positive experience.
Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.12425 [cs.CY]
(or arXiv:2606.12425v1 [cs.CY] for this version)
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 168 words
Related coverage

WordCamp Galicia 2026 concludes its first edition in A Coruña with a resounding success in participation
xornalgalicia.com · Oct 18, 2026

Google launches Gemini 4 Carbon with a ‘significant leap’ in cybersecurity
The Verge · Oct 28, 2026
Singapore Establishes Task Force to Strengthen Defense Against AI-Enabled Cyber Threats
36Kr · Oct 14, 2026

Tennessee Launches K-12 Quantum Education Program Through TN QuantumWorks
The Quantum Insider · Jul 17, 2026