Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This empirical study clarifies that increasing training data scale consistently enhances visual generalization, whereas increasing model complexity yields unstable performance gains. The research further highlights that while removing color information degrades results, explicit prior features like gradients and edges show inconsistent effects depending on the specific architecture. These findings offer practical guidance for optimizing vision models by prioritizing data volume over parameter scaling and cautioning against relying on specific input modalities without architectural validation.
Sources coveringarXiv, Quantum Computing Report, Latent Space, The Quantum Insider
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

An Empirical Study of Data Scale, Model Complexity, and Input Modalities in Visual Generalization

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2606.04409v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern deep neural networks usually have large parameter scales and nonlinear hierarchical structures, and they have achieved strong performance in computer vision. However, the source of their generalization performance remains difficult to explain using traditional statistical learning theory. Among the factors that may affect visual generalization, data scale, model complexity, and input modalities are fundamental and controllable variables. This study empirically analyzes how these three factors influence model generalization performance. Specifically, in a preliminary experiment, we construct a one-dimensional nonlinear function and vary the number of training samples and the polynomial degree to observe the effects of data scale and model complexity on model performance. In the main experiments, we compare model performance on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 under different training data scales, model architectures, and input modalities. The experimental results show that increasing the training data scale consistently improves generalization performance, whereas changes in model complexity do not provide stable gains. In addition, removing color information degrades model performance, while explicit prior features such as gradients, edges, and wavelets have inconsistent effects across different model architectures. Overall, this study provides an empirical analysis of the relationships among data scale, model complexity, input modalities, and visual generalization performance. Code and experimental logs are available at: https://github.com/zlyd-CV/DeepLearning-Empirical-Studies.

Abstract:Modern deep neural networks usually have large parameter scales and nonlinear hierarchical structures, and they have achieved strong performance in computer vision. However, the source of their generalization performance remains difficult to explain using traditional statistical learning theory. Among the factors that may affect visual generalization, data scale, model complexity, and input modalities are fundamental and controllable variables. This study empirically analyzes how these three factors influence model generalization performance. Specifically, in a preliminary experiment, we construct a one-dimensional nonlinear function and vary the number of training samples and the polynomial degree to observe the effects of data scale and model complexity on model performance. In the main experiments, we compare model performance on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 under different training data scales, model architectures, and input modalities. The experimental results show that increasing the training data scale consistently improves generalization performance, whereas changes in model complexity do not provide stable gains. In addition, removing color information degrades model performance, while explicit prior features such as gradients, edges, and wavelets have inconsistent effects across different model architectures. Overall, this study provides an empirical analysis of the relationships among data scale, model complexity, input modalities, and visual generalization performance. Code and experimental logs are available at: this https URL.

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2606.04409 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2606.04409v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04409 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 310 words

Related coverage