Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces an "argmax principle" for analyzing Sum-of-Squares relaxations over the unit sphere, unifying convergence analyses across problems like Best Separable State and matrix norms. By treating high-order pseudo-moment maximizers as rounding candidates, it simplifies proofs and establishes tight degree bounds that align with hardness results from QMA(2) protocols under the Exponential-Time Hypothesis.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

An Argmax Principle for Sum-of-Squares Relaxations on the Sphere

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2608.02594v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We develop an argmax principle for analyzing sum-of-squares relaxations of optimization problems over the unit sphere. Given a feasible pseudo-expectation, we form a polynomial of high-order pseudo-moments, such as $\Phi_k(u)=\widetilde{\mathbb E}\langle x,u\rangle^{2k}$. Our guiding principle is that its maximizers are rounding candidates: their local and global optimality conditions reveal the reweighed pseudo-expectation inequalities governing SoS convergence. This viewpoint unifies several problems previously analyzed by rather different techniques. We obtain three results. First, for Best Separable State, we give a degree-$O(\sqrt{n/\epsilon})$ SoS analysis for approximating $h_{\mathrm{sep}}(P)$ in the perfect-completeness regime, improving and simplifying Barak, Kothari and Steurer (STOC'17). The dependence is essentially tight for inverse-linear gap under the Exponential-Time Hypothesis, matching hardness from $\mathrm{QMA}(2)$ protocols. Second, for the matrix $2\to4$ norm, degree-$O(\sqrt n/\epsilon)$ SoS gives a multiplicative $(1+\epsilon)$ approximation. Barak et al. (STOC'12) previously gave a comparable-time constant-gap decision algorithm; our result gives a multiplicative guarantee and extends to a family of $p\to q$ norms with even $q$. Finally, for degree-$d$ polynomial optimization, we recover the convergence theorem of Bhattiprolu et al. (FOCS'17) with a shorter, more direct proof: degree-$k$ SoS gives approximation ratio $O_d((n/k)^{d/2-1})$. The paper introduces no new relaxation. Instead, the high-moment argmax gives a common way to read an SoS solution, unifying previously separate convergence analyses and yielding sharper bounds or simpler proofs.

Abstract:We develop an argmax principle for analyzing sum-of-squares relaxations of optimization problems over the unit sphere. Given a feasible pseudo-expectation, we form a polynomial of high-order pseudo-moments, such as $\Phi_k(u)=\widetilde{\mathbb E}\langle x,u\rangle^{2k}$. Our guiding principle is that its maximizers are rounding candidates: their local and global optimality conditions reveal the reweighed pseudo-expectation inequalities governing SoS convergence. This viewpoint unifies several problems previously analyzed by rather different techniques. We obtain three results. First, for Best Separable State, we give a degree-$O(\sqrt{n/\epsilon})$ SoS analysis for approximating $h_{\mathrm{sep}}(P)$ in the perfect-completeness regime, improving and simplifying Barak, Kothari and Steurer (STOC'17). The dependence is essentially tight for inverse-linear gap under the Exponential-Time Hypothesis, matching hardness from $\mathrm{QMA}(2)$ protocols. Second, for the matrix $2\to4$ norm, degree-$O(\sqrt n/\epsilon)$ SoS gives a multiplicative $(1+\epsilon)$ approximation. Barak et al. (STOC'12) previously gave a comparable-time constant-gap decision algorithm; our result gives a multiplicative guarantee and extends to a family of $p\to q$ norms with even $q$. Finally, for degree-$d$ polynomial optimization, we recover the convergence theorem of Bhattiprolu et al. (FOCS'17) with a shorter, more direct proof: degree-$k$ SoS gives approximation ratio $O_d((n/k)^{d/2-1})$. The paper introduces no new relaxation. Instead, the high-moment argmax gives a common way to read an SoS solution, unifying previously separate convergence analyses and yielding sharper bounds or simpler proofs.

Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)

arXiv:2608.02594 [cs.CC]

(or arXiv:2608.02594v1 [cs.CC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.02594 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 312 words

Related coverage