aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces a geometric measurement framework for analyzing residual stream transitions within Transformer models, revealing consistent depth-dependent patterns in representation displacement across various tasks. By decomposing layer interactions into rigid rotations and non-rigid residuals, the study provides descriptive regularities that help characterize model behavior without offering causal explanations of computational effort. These findings offer researchers new tools to probe internal dynamics essential for understanding deep learning architectures at a structural level.
An Analysis of Residual-Stream Geometry Across Transformer Depth
arXiv:2607.18348v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose a transition-centred geometric analysis of transformer residual streams. Relative displacement measures how \emph{far} representations move between consecutive layers, and orthogonal Procrustes analysis separates each transition into a rigid rotation and a non-rigid residual. Across six instruction-tuned models, on code generation and cross-lingual translation, these measurements reveal reproducible depth regularities. Relative displacement is strongly layer-dependent; typically larger early and late, with a quieter middle third; and nearly invariant across conditions within each model. Rotation magnitude is nearly constant across depth, while Procrustes residual and angle concentration remain depth-modulated, with residual peaking at the final transition. During generation, non-English targets show larger final-layer displacement and residual than English targets. We present these as descriptive geometric regularities, not as measures of computational effort or causal explanations. The contribution is a measurement framework for residual-stream transitions and evidence that, in the settings studied here, depth curves are model-dependent and largely condition-stable.
Abstract:We propose a transition-centred geometric analysis of transformer residual streams. Relative displacement measures how \emph{far} representations move between consecutive layers, and orthogonal Procrustes analysis separates each transition into a rigid rotation and a non-rigid residual. Across six instruction-tuned models, on code generation and cross-lingual translation, these measurements reveal reproducible depth regularities. Relative displacement is strongly layer-dependent; typically larger early and late, with a quieter middle third; and nearly invariant across conditions within each model. Rotation magnitude is nearly constant across depth, while Procrustes residual and angle concentration remain depth-modulated, with residual peaking at the final transition. During generation, non-English targets show larger final-layer displacement and residual than English targets. We present these as descriptive geometric regularities, not as measures of computational effort or causal explanations. The contribution is a measurement framework for residual-stream transitions and evidence that, in the settings studied here, depth curves are model-dependent and largely condition-stable.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2607.18348 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2607.18348v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.18348 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 246 words
Related coverage

Increasing Skill Level Recruits Deeper Attention Layers in a Frozen Chess Transformer
LessWrong · Sep 24, 2026

How Does Changing the Elo of a Chess Transformer Affect its Computations?
LessWrong · Sep 29, 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026

A Key-Position Confound in no-cot-bench (and implications for interpreting looped transformers)
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026