Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces an iterative refinement framework designed to overcome the polynomial precision loss inherent in standard quantum state tomography when used with quantum linear system algorithms (QLSA). By solving a sequence of related linear systems, the proposed method maintains polylogarithmic dependence on error tolerance across QRAM, LCU, and oracle-based input models. Numerical evaluations on simulators and real hardware confirm that this approach effectively enhances solution precision while demonstrating robustness against current quantum noise levels.
Sources coveringarXiv, AMD, Quantum Zeitgeist
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

An analysis of iterative refinement for quantum linear system solvers

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.10250v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present and analyze an iterative refinement (IR) framework for improving the precision dependence of algorithms that combine a quantum linear system algorithm (QLSA) with quantum state tomography. Existing QLSAs achieve polylogarithmic dependence on the inverse error tolerance to prepare a quantum state encoding the solution, but extracting a classical description of such a state via tomography typically introduces a polynomial dependence on the target precision. To retain polylogarithmic dependence in the inverse error tolerance throughout the entire process, we develop an IR scheme that solves a sequence of related linear systems to progressively refine the solution while requiring only fixed-precision quantum subroutines, finally obtaining a classical description of a high-precision solution. We analyze the proposed framework under three input models: quantum-read/classical-write RAM (QRAM), linear combinations of unitaries (LCU), and sparse-access oracles. We evaluate the proposed scheme through numerical experiments on both quantum simulators and real quantum hardware. The results demonstrate that iterative refinement efficiently improves the precision of the solution and exhibits robustness to hardware noise.

Abstract:We present and analyze an iterative refinement (IR) framework for improving the precision dependence of algorithms that combine a quantum linear system algorithm (QLSA) with quantum state tomography. Existing QLSAs achieve polylogarithmic dependence on the inverse error tolerance to prepare a quantum state encoding the solution, but extracting a classical description of such a state via tomography typically introduces a polynomial dependence on the target precision. To retain polylogarithmic dependence in the inverse error tolerance throughout the entire process, we develop an IR scheme that solves a sequence of related linear systems to progressively refine the solution while requiring only fixed-precision quantum subroutines, finally obtaining a classical description of a high-precision solution. We analyze the proposed framework under three input models: quantum-read/classical-write RAM (QRAM), linear combinations of unitaries (LCU), and sparse-access oracles. We evaluate the proposed scheme through numerical experiments on both quantum simulators and real quantum hardware. The results demonstrate that iterative refinement efficiently improves the precision of the solution and exhibits robustness to hardware noise.

Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Numerical Analysis (math.NA)

arXiv:2609.10250 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2609.10250v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.10250 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 264 words

Related coverage